Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Maintaining Laboratory Cultures of Gryllus bimaculatus, a Versatile Orthopteran Model for Insect Agriculture and Invertebrate Physiology
Published on: June 8, 2022
Performance is no proxy for genetic quality: trade-offs between locomotion, attractiveness, and life history in
Simon P Lailvaux1, Matthew D Hall, Robert C Brooks
1Evolution and Ecology Research Centre and School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia. slailvaux@gmail.com
Abstract:
The genetic relationships among traits contributing to overall fitness are an important subject of inquiry because such relationships influence how suites of traits respond to selection. Within the field of sexual selection, these relationships are also of interest for assessing whether any given trait can be used as a proxy for total fitness. A growing number of studies have demonstrated close links between whole-organism performance traits and determinants of individual fitness; however, an understanding of the genetic relationships between performance and important aspects of genetic quality is currently lacking. We present the results of a quantitative genetic study in which we estimate covariation between a locomotor performance trait (maximal jumping ability), calling effort, sexual attractiveness, and life-history traits in male Teleogryllus commodus crickets. We show that the major axis of genetic variation (gmax) is characterized by a contrast between jump performance and life-history traits associated with mating success. Moreover, two additional axes of significant multivariate genetic variation exist, each characterized by strong contrasts among traits. These results argue against the existence of a single axis representing genetic quality, favoring instead the idea that resource allocation strategies shape multiple dimensions of genetic quality through trade-offs among key life-history traits, including performance.
Related Concept Videos
Limits to Natural Selection
Mate Choice
Life Histories
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Genetic Drift
Frequency-dependent Selection

