Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Cause and Effect

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...

Biological Influences on Intelligence

Biological Influences on Intelligence

Intelligence is often thought to be linked to brain size, but the relationship is more complex than that. While brain size does correlate modestly with some abilities, like verbal skills, the connection is weaker for others, such as spatial reasoning. Other factors, like brain structure, also play crucial roles. For instance, despite Einstein's smaller-than-average brain, his parietal cortex, which is involved in spatial reasoning, was 15% wider, suggesting that neural density might matter more...

Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes

Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes

Cognitive processes affect social behavior by guiding how individuals perceive, interpret, and respond to social stimuli. These mental processes enable individuals to assess others' behaviors, attribute causes to their actions, and form expectations based on past experiences.Causes of Behavior and Social JudgmentsIndividuals determine the causes of others' behaviors by distinguishing between personal traits and external circumstances. For example, if a friend frequently arrives late, an...

Reason and Intuition

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...

Reasoning

Reasoning

Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Sex Differences in Variability in General Intelligence: A New Look at the Old Question.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2015

Same author

Directional dominance on stature and cognition in diverse human populations.

Nature·2015

Same author

Improving Phenotypic Prediction by Combining Genetic and Epigenetic Associations.

American journal of human genetics·2015

Same author

A comparison of location of acute symptomatic vs. 'silent' small vessel lesions.

International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society·2015

Same author

Rare and low-frequency variants and their association with plasma levels of fibrinogen, FVII, FVIII, and vWF.

Blood·2015

Same author

Coupled changes in brain white matter microstructure and fluid intelligence in later life.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2015

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Intelligence and education: causal perceptions drive analytic processes and therefore conclusions.

Ian J Deary¹, Wendy Johnson

¹Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology and Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. i.deary@ed.ac.uk

International Journal of Epidemiology

|May 28, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers often control for education or intelligence in studies, but unstated assumptions about their relationship lead to varied results. Clarity in assumptions and analysis is crucial for accurate interpretations in social science and epidemiology.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Social Epidemiology
Behavioral Genetics
Sociology of Education

Background:

Educational attainment is linked to significant life outcomes like income, occupation, and health.
Researchers frequently use educational attainment as a control variable in epidemiological and social science studies.
Disagreements exist on whether education or genetically influenced intelligence is the appropriate control variable.

Purpose of the Study:

To highlight the variation in how education and intelligence are treated in research.
To emphasize the impact of differing causal assumptions on analytical approaches and interpretations.
To advocate for greater clarity and objectivity in research on education and intelligence.

Main Methods:

Documentation of examples illustrating the divergent treatment of education and intelligence.
Analysis of how unstated assumptions influence analytical strategies and study outcomes.
Discussion of implications for designing future research studies.

Main Results:

Significant variation exists in the analytical approaches to education and intelligence as control variables.
Different assumptions about the causal relationship between education and intelligence yield divergent results.
Lack of clarity in assumptions leads to varied interpretations in scientific literature.

Conclusions:

Greater transparency regarding underlying assumptions in research is essential.
Standardized analytical approaches and objective interpretation of results are recommended.
Clearer articulation of assumptions will improve the design and validity of social scientific studies.