Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis
Thomas G Brott1, Robert W Hobson, George Howard
1Mayo Clinic, Griffin 304, 4500 San Pablo Rd., Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA. brott.thomas@mayo.edu
Insights
Carotid stenting and endarterectomy showed similar long-term outcomes for carotid stenosis. However, stenting had a higher periprocedural stroke risk, while endarterectomy had a higher myocardial infarction risk.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Vascular Surgery
- Cardiology
Background:
- Carotid-artery stenosis is a significant stroke risk factor.
- Carotid-artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are primary interventions.
- Comparing CAS and CEA is crucial for stroke prevention strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of CAS versus CEA in patients with carotid stenosis.
- To evaluate the composite primary endpoint of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death.
- To assess long-term outcomes, including ipsilateral stroke rates.
Main Methods:
- Randomized trial involving 2502 patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis.
- Patients were assigned to either CAS or CEA.
- Primary endpoint: composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death within 4 years.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in the 4-year composite primary endpoint between CAS and CEA (7.2% vs. 6.8%).
- Higher periprocedural stroke risk with CAS (4.1% vs. 2.3%), higher periprocedural myocardial infarction risk with CEA (1.1% vs. 2.3%).
- Similar low rates of ipsilateral stroke after the periprocedural period for both groups.
Conclusions:
- CAS and CEA demonstrate comparable long-term effectiveness for carotid stenosis.
- Periprocedural risks differ, with higher stroke rates for CAS and higher myocardial infarction rates for CEA.
- Patient selection should consider these procedural risks and benefits.
Background:
Carotid-artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy are both options for treating carotid-artery stenosis, an important cause of stroke.
Methods:
We randomly assigned patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis to undergo carotid-artery stenting or carotid endarterectomy. The primary composite end point was stroke, myocardial infarction, or death from any cause during the periprocedural period or any ipsilateral stroke within 4 years after randomization.
Results:
For 2502 patients over a median follow-up period of 2.5 years, there was no significant difference in the estimated 4-year rates of the primary end point between the stenting group and the endarterectomy group (7.2% and 6.8%, respectively; hazard ratio with stenting, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.81 to 1.51; P=0.51). There was no differential treatment effect with regard to the primary end point according to symptomatic status (P=0.84) or sex (P=0.34). The 4-year rate of stroke or death was 6.4% with stenting and 4.7% with endarterectomy (hazard ratio, 1.50; P=0.03); the rates among symptomatic patients were 8.0% and 6.4% (hazard ratio, 1.37; P=0.14), and the rates among asymptomatic patients were 4.5% and 2.7% (hazard ratio, 1.86; P=0.07), respectively. Periprocedural rates of individual components of the end points differed between the stenting group and the endarterectomy group: for death (0.7% vs. 0.3%, P=0.18), for stroke (4.1% vs. 2.3%, P=0.01), and for myocardial infarction (1.1% vs. 2.3%, P=0.03). After this period, the incidences of ipsilateral stroke with stenting and with endarterectomy were similarly low (2.0% and 2.4%, respectively; P=0.85).
Conclusions:
Among patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis, the risk of the composite primary outcome of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death did not differ significantly in the group undergoing carotid-artery stenting and the group undergoing carotid endarterectomy. During the periprocedural period, there was a higher risk of stroke with stenting and a higher risk of myocardial infarction with endarterectomy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00004732.)
More Related Videos
12:30Vascular Gene Transfer from Metallic Stent Surfaces Using Adenoviral Vectors Tethered through Hydrolysable Cross-linkers
Published on: August 12, 2014
09:36A Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Computational Protocol for Analysis of Plaque Morphology and Hemodynamics in Patients with Carotid Artery Stenosis
Published on: August 12, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care