Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Utero-tubal Embryo Transfer and Vasectomy in the Mouse Model
Published on: February 28, 2014
Microtubal reanastomosis: success rates as compared to in vitro fertilization
Ronald Hirth1, Edward Zbella, Mark Sanchez
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bayfront Medical Center, 700 6th Street South, 2nd Floor, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, USA. hirth4@gmail.com
Objective:
To determine the pregnancy rates of microtubal reanastomosis (MTR) and any associated clinical variables, to determine pregnancy rates and live birth rates of MTR as compared to in vitro fertilization (IVF) and to study the rates of ectopic pregnancy and spontaneous abortion (SAB) after MTR.
Study Design:
Retrospective chart review.
Results:
At our institution, the pregnancy rate in the first 12 months following MTR was 44.3%. The study also showed that 2 clinical variables of the MTR procedure that had higher pregnancy rates were when Hulka clips (Hulka-Clemens, Richard Wolf, Rosemont, Illinois) or Filshie clips (Coopersurgical, Lake Forest, California) were used as the mechanism of tubal occlusion and if bilateral MTR was performed instead of unilateral. There was not a significant difference in the pregnancy rates of MTR (44.3%) vs. IVF (38%). However, there was a statistically significant difference in the live birth rate of MTR (19%) vs. IVF (31%) (p=0.007). The rates of ectopic pregnancy and SAB after MTR were 10% and 15.7%, respectively.
Conclusion:
This study showed a significantly higher live birth rate when patients underwent IVF as compared to MTR in the first 12 months following an MTR procedure.
More Related Videos
09:35Modified MicroSecure Vitrification: A Safe, Simple and Highly Effective Cryopreservation Procedure for Human Blastocysts
Published on: March 2, 2017
06:28Vessel-Sparing Microsurgical Longitudinal Intussusception Vasoepididymostomy to Treat Epididymal Obstructive Azoospermia
Published on: May 27, 2022