Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Subcuticular Prolene or PDS for skin closure?

M N Vipond1, A F Higgins

  • 1Hinchingbrooke Hospital, Huntingdon, UK.

Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh
|April 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

This study found no significant differences in wound complications or cosmetic outcomes between polypropylene (Prolene) and polydioxanone (PDS) sutures for abdominal surgery. Absorbable subcuticular sutures are safe for all wound types.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Five-year prospective follow-up of 430 laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repairs in 275 patients.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2010
Same author

Duodenal obstruction by gallstone in the absence of cholecystoenteric fistula, an unusual complication of total gastrectomy: report of a case.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2009
Same author

Duodenal ulcer perforation: the effect of H(2) antagonists?

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2009
Same author

To stitch or not to stitch the fat?

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2009
Same author

Review of the management of recurrent inguinal hernia.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2003
Same author

Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography to detect common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

The British journal of surgery·1998

Area of Science:

  • Surgical wound closure techniques
  • Biomaterials in surgery
  • Wound healing and management

Background:

  • Subcuticular wound closure is a common surgical technique.
  • Polypropylene (Prolene) and polydioxanone (PDS) are frequently used suture materials.
  • Evaluating suture efficacy and patient outcomes is crucial for surgical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the safety and cosmetic results of polypropylene (Prolene) versus polydioxanone (PDS) sutures for subcuticular wound closure in abdominal surgery.
  • To assess wound complications and patient satisfaction at discharge and 3 months post-surgery.
  • To determine the suitability of absorbable subcuticular sutures for all wound classes.

Main Methods:

  • Randomized allocation of 100 patients undergoing abdominal surgery to either polypropylene or polydioxanone subcuticular sutures.
  • Assessment of 91 patients at discharge and 3 months post-surgery.
  • Evaluation of wound complications (e.g., infection) and cosmetic outcomes.

Main Results:

  • No statistically significant differences were observed between polypropylene (Prolene) and polydioxanone (PDS) sutures regarding wound complications or cosmetic results.
  • The overall wound infection rate was 5.5%.
  • Cosmetic outcomes were equally acceptable for both suture materials.

Conclusions:

  • Both polypropylene (Prolene) and polydioxanone (PDS) sutures are safe and effective for subcuticular wound closure in abdominal surgery.
  • Absorbable subcuticular sutures, such as PDS, can be safely used in all classes of surgical wounds.
  • The choice between Prolene and PDS for subcuticular closure may not significantly impact short-term wound healing or aesthetic outcomes.

Related Experiment Videos