Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
NMR Spectrometers: Resolution and Error Correction01:14

NMR Spectrometers: Resolution and Error Correction

When magnetic nuclei in a sample achieve resonance and undergo relaxation, the signal detected in NMR is an approximately exponential free induction decay. Fourier transform of an exponential decay yields a Lorentzian peak in the frequency domain. Lorentzian peaks in an NMR spectrum are defined by their amplitude, full width at half maximum, and position, where the peak width is governed by the spin-spin relaxation time alone. In real experiments, however, the applied magnetic field is rendered...
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
X-ray Diffraction of Biological Samples01:10

X-ray Diffraction of Biological Samples

X-ray diffraction or XRD is an analytical tool that utilizes X-rays to study ordered structures such as crystalline organic and inorganic samples, polycrystalline materials, proteins, carbohydrates, and drugs.
According to Bragg's law, when X-rays strike the sample positioned on a stage, the rays are  scattered by the electron clouds around the sample atoms. The  X-ray diffraction or scattering is caused by constructive interference of the X-ray waves that reflect off the internal crystal...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Guiding AlphaFold predictions with experimental knowledge to inform dynamics and interactions with VAIRO.

Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society·2026
Same author

Conformational plasticity across phylogenetic clusters of RND multidrug efflux pumps and its impact on substrate specificity.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Protocol for sequence clustering with PaSiMap in Jalview.

STAR protocols·2025
Same author

Conformational plasticity across phylogenetic clusters of RND multidrug efflux pumps and its impact on substrate specificity.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same author

Structure and dynamics of the active site of hen egg-white lysozyme from atomic resolution neutron crystallography.

Structure (London, England : 1993)·2024
Same author

<i>XDSGUI</i>: a graphical user interface for <i>XDS</i>, <i>SHELX</i> and <i>ARCIMBOLDO</i>.

Journal of applied crystallography·2023
Same journal

Structural insights into the synthesis of FMN in prokaryotic organisms.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography·2015
Same journal

Native sulfur/chlorine SAD phasing for serial femtosecond crystallography.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography·2015
Same journal

Serial crystallographic analysis of protein isomorphous replacement data from a mixture of native and derivative microcrystals.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography·2015
Same journal

The first crystal structure of the peptidase domain of the U32 peptidase family.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography·2015
Same journal

Atomic resolution crystal structure of Sapp2p, a secreted aspartic protease from Candida parapsilosis.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography·2015
Same journal

Structural characterization of a mitochondrial 3-ketoacyl-CoA (T1)-like thiolase from Mycobacterium smegmatis.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography·2015
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Quantifying X-Ray Fluorescence Data Using MAPS
14:58

Quantifying X-Ray Fluorescence Data Using MAPS

Published on: February 17, 2018

Quantifying instrument errors in macromolecular X-ray data sets.

Kay Diederichs1

  • 1University of Konstanz, Faculty of Biology, M647, D-78457 Konstanz, Germany. kay.diederichs@uni-konstanz.de

Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography
|June 3, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new indicator estimates instrument error in macromolecular X-ray crystallography by measuring the highest signal-to-noise ratio achievable. This helps determine experimental setup limitations, improving data accuracy.

More Related Videos

Biochemical and Structural Characterization of the Carbohydrate Transport Substrate-binding-protein SP0092
08:53

Biochemical and Structural Characterization of the Carbohydrate Transport Substrate-binding-protein SP0092

Published on: October 2, 2017

Synchrotron X-ray Microdiffraction and Fluorescence Imaging of Mineral and Rock Samples
10:12

Synchrotron X-ray Microdiffraction and Fluorescence Imaging of Mineral and Rock Samples

Published on: June 19, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Quantifying X-Ray Fluorescence Data Using MAPS
14:58

Quantifying X-Ray Fluorescence Data Using MAPS

Published on: February 17, 2018

Biochemical and Structural Characterization of the Carbohydrate Transport Substrate-binding-protein SP0092
08:53

Biochemical and Structural Characterization of the Carbohydrate Transport Substrate-binding-protein SP0092

Published on: October 2, 2017

Synchrotron X-ray Microdiffraction and Fluorescence Imaging of Mineral and Rock Samples
10:12

Synchrotron X-ray Microdiffraction and Fluorescence Imaging of Mineral and Rock Samples

Published on: June 19, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Crystallography
  • Structural Biology
  • X-ray Diffraction

Background:

  • Macromolecular X-ray crystallography relies on precise experimental setups.
  • Estimating systematic instrument error is crucial for accurate data.
  • Existing methods may not fully capture experimental limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel indicator for estimating systematic instrument error.
  • To relate this indicator to the signal-to-noise ratio and merging R factor.
  • To investigate factors influencing experimental setup stability.

Main Methods:

  • Data reduction of test datasets to calculate the indicator.
  • Analysis of experimental setup components (X-ray beam, shutter, goniometer, cryostream, detector).
  • Influence of exposure time and spindle speed on stability.
  • Test calculations using SIM_MX software.

Main Results:

  • The indicator's value reflects the highest achievable signal-to-noise ratio [I/sigma(I)].
  • Its reciprocal correlates with the lower limit of the merging R factor.
  • Experimental setup stability is influenced by beam, shutter, goniometer, cryostream, detector, exposure, and spindle speed.
  • Typical indicator values were determined from JCSG archive datasets.

Conclusions:

  • Data accuracy at low resolution is often limited by the experimental setup, not the crystal.
  • Vibrations and fluctuations can be reduced by lowering spindle speed and increasing attenuation.
  • The developed indicator provides a valuable tool for assessing instrument performance in X-ray crystallography.