Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
[Surgical correction of aortic valve disease with various types of prostheses]
Insights
Mechanical valve prostheses in aortic valve replacement optimize left ventricular function and myocardial mass recovery. Biological valve prostheses did not significantly increase ejection fraction and led to aortic size increase post-surgery.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Aortic valve disease affects a significant patient population.
- Surgical intervention, including aortic valve replacement (AVR), is a common treatment.
- Understanding the functional impact of different prosthetic valves is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the functional changes in left ventricular dynamics after AVR.
- To compare the effects of mechanical versus biological valve prostheses on cardiac function.
- To assess postoperative recovery of myocardial mass, mitral valve, and left atrium.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 394 patients undergoing AVR.
- Patients categorized into aortic stenosis (Group 1) and aortic insufficiency (Group 2) predominant groups.
- Functional assessment of left ventricular dynamics 7-15 days post-operation.
Main Results:
- Mechanical valve prosthesis implantation led to optimal left ventricular changes and myocardial mass recovery.
- Functional recovery of the mitral valve and left atrium was observed with mechanical prostheses.
- Biological valve prostheses did not show a significant increase in left ventricle ejection fraction.
- Ascending aorta size increased in the early postoperative period following biological valve implantation.
Conclusions:
- Mechanical valve prostheses appear superior in promoting early left ventricular functional recovery and myocardial adaptation post-AVR.
- Biological valve prostheses may be associated with less favorable early hemodynamic changes and aortic remodeling.
Abstract:
Aortic valve replacement was carried out 394 patients. Among them 311 patients were men, 83 - women. Age of the patients varied from 10 to 78 years; mean age amounted 36.9+/-1.3 years. The patients were divided into 2 groups. 165 (41.9%) patients with aortic stenosis and combined aortic valve disease with predominance of stenosis formed the 1st group. 229 (58.1%) patients with aortic insufficiency and combined aortic valve disease with predominance of insufficiency formed the 2nd group. Mechanical valve prosthesis was applied in 224 patients, biological valve prosthesis - in 47 patients. Functional changes in left ventricular dynamics were evaluated in terms from 7 to 15 days after the operation. Received data show that implantation of mechanical valve prosthesis provides for optimal changes of left ventricular, myocardial mass and leads to functional recovery of mitral valve and left atrium. Significant increase of left ventricle ejection fraction was not observed after the implantation of biological valve prostheses; on the contrary ascending aorta size increases in early postoperative period.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction

