Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Encoding01:19

Encoding

1.1K
Information enters the brain through encoding, which is the input of information into the memory system. Once sensory information is received from the environment, the brain labels or codes it. The information is then organized with similar information and connected to existing concepts. Encoding occurs through automatic processing and effortful processing.
Automatic processing involves the encoding of details like time, space, frequency, and the meaning of words, usually done without conscious...
1.1K
Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

1.3K
Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this...
1.3K
Elaborative Rehearsals01:07

Elaborative Rehearsals

568
Elaborative rehearsal is a crucial cognitive strategy that strengthens information encoding in long-term memory by making meaningful connections between new data and pre-existing knowledge. This approach contrasts with maintenance rehearsal, which involves simple repetition without delving into the significance of the information. While maintenance rehearsal might temporarily keep information active in short-term memory, it is less effective for long-term retention.
The effectiveness of...
568
Impact of Schemas01:30

Impact of Schemas

319
Schemas are cognitive structures that provide a framework for interpreting and organizing social information. They help individuals navigate complex environments by offering expectations about people, events, and behaviors. Schemas influence attention, encoding, and retrieval processes, thereby shaping the entire trajectory of information processing in social contexts.Attention and Cognitive LoadDuring initial attention, schemas function as filters that prioritize schema-consistent information,...
319

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Advancing psychiatric care through neuromodulation: From translational research to clinical practice.

Dusunen adam : Bakirkoy Ruh ve Sinir Hastaliklari Hastanesi yayin organi·2026
Same author

Shared genetic architecture between Alzheimer's disease and brain morphology.

Alzheimer's research & therapy·2026
Same author

Trans-ethnic estimation and implications of genetic impact on continuous glycemic profiles.

Cell discovery·2026
Same author

Clozapine prescribing in Germany: temporal trends and regional variations, 2012-2022.

Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)·2026
Same author

Adult psychiatrists' views on clozapine prescribing for schizophrenia in Germany-an online survey.

Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology·2026
Same author

Local chemoarchitecture explains widespread lower cortical thickness associated with clinical high risk for psychosis.

Molecular psychiatry·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 1, 2026

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

8.8K

Attentional demand influences strategies for encoding into visual working memory.

Jutta S Mayer1, Robert A Bittner, David E J Linden

  • 1Laboratory for Neurophysiology and Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany.

Advances in Cognitive Psychology
|June 3, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Visual selective attention and visual working memory (WM) share limited resources. Participants prioritized memorizing target locations over encoding shapes when search was difficult, increasing processing time but maintaining memory performance.

Keywords:
attentionencoding strategiesinterferenceworking memory

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.2K
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 1, 2026

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

8.8K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.2K
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Perception

Background:

  • Visual selective attention and visual working memory (WM) are capacity-limited cognitive functions.
  • These two mechanisms often compete for shared processing resources.
  • Understanding how the brain manages interference between attention and WM is crucial for cognitive science.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how individuals manage competing demands between visual selective attention and visual working memory.
  • To determine if and how participants can cope with tasks requiring simultaneous attention and WM encoding.
  • To explore the strategies employed when attentional resources are taxed during visual search and memory tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a task involving visual search for target locations and subsequent encoding of object shapes into WM.
  • The visual search component varied in difficulty, featuring either an attention-demanding serial search ('non pop-out') or a low-demand search ('pop-out').
  • Performance was measured by memory accuracy and processing time, supplemented by subjective participant reports.

Main Results:

  • High memory performance was maintained across all conditions, regardless of search difficulty.
  • In 'non pop-out' conditions, participants experienced increased processing time.
  • Evidence suggests participants prioritized memorizing target locations before encoding object shapes, indicating an inability to interleave search and encoding steps.

Conclusions:

  • Memory for target locations can compensate for the lack of perceptual 'pop-out', facilitating coping with shared processing limitations.
  • The findings highlight a trade-off between processing speed and memory accuracy when attentional demands are high.
  • This research offers insights into how cognitive systems manage simultaneous demands on attention and working memory in complex, real-world scenarios.