Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

An Approach to Point-Of-Care Ultrasound Evaluation of the Abdominal Aorta
Published on: September 8, 2023
Internal or external wall diameter for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening?
1Department of Vascular Surgery, Brighton & Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK. a.thapar09@imperial.ac.uk
Insights
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening measurements of internal wall diameter underestimate aneurysm size by 6 mm compared to external wall measurements. This difference and greater variability in internal measurements may delay AAA detection and treatment.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Medical Imaging
- Public Health Screening
Background:
- The UK's national abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening programme measures internal wall diameter.
- Current UK intervention criteria rely on external wall diameter measurements.
- A discrepancy exists between these two measurement methods, necessitating clinical evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the clinical significance of the difference between internal and external wall diameter measurements in abdominal aortic aneurysms.
- To assess the impact of measurement methodology on AAA detection and treatment criteria.
Main Methods:
- Fifty patients in an aneurysm surveillance program underwent ultrasound scans.
- Two experienced vascular scientists performed measurements, blinded to each other's results.
- Maximum anteroposterior internal and external wall diameters were measured.
Main Results:
- A median difference of 6-7 mm was observed between internal and external diameters.
- This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.0002).
- External wall diameter measurements exhibited less interobserver variability (3 mm vs 6 mm).
Conclusions:
- Internal wall diameter measurements used in AAA screening underestimate aneurysm size by approximately 6 mm.
- Internal measurements show greater variability compared to external measurements.
- Understanding these differences is crucial to prevent delays in AAA detection and treatment.
Introduction:
The national abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening programme measures internal wall diameter; however, current UK intervention criteria use external wall diameter. Our aim was to determine the clinical significance of the difference between these two measurements.
Patients And Methods:
Fifty patients on an aneurysm surveillance programme were ultrasound scanned by two experienced vascular scientists, blinded to the other's results. Maximum anteroposterior internal wall and maximum anteroposterior external wall diameters were measured.
Results:
The median difference between internal and external diameter was 6 mm (IQR 6-7) for scientist 1 and 7 mm (IQR 5-8) for scientist 2. This was statistically significant (P < 0.0002). External wall diameter displayed less interobserver variability (3 mm vs 6 mm).
Conclusions:
Screening measurements underestimate aneurysm size by 6 mm and display greater variability in comparison to external wall measurements. These findings should be understood to prevent a delay in the detection and treatment of AAAs.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aneurysm I: Introduction

