Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bandwidth of gamma-distribution-shaped functions via Lambert W function.

Statistics & probability letters·2026
Same author

A Common Prescription Lens Correction Causes Motion Illusions in the Presbyopic and General Populations.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same author

Focusing on color: How the eye chooses which wavelength to see best.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Monovision-induced motion illusions in presbyopic and non-presbyopic populations.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Projected Normal Distribution: Moment Approximations and Generalizations.

ArXiv·2025
Same author

The Optimal Retinal Locus for High-Resolution Vision in Space and Time.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same journal

Vestibular function drives gaze stability in locomoting macaques.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Region- and layer-specific glutamatergic synapse development in the nascent cortical hierarchy.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Endogenous peptide derived from c-Cbl-associated protein counteracts its inhibitory effect on enteric neural crest cell colonization in Hirschsprung disease.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Drowsiness alters the neural dynamics but not the core computations of multisensory integration.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same journal

A Matter of Parameters: Tailored Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Enhances Cortico-Thalamo-Cortical Circuit Resonance.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Proactive visual and motor prioritization differentially scale with cue reliability.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

Visual-haptic adaptation is determined by relative reliability.

Johannes Burge1, Ahna R Girshick, Martin S Banks

  • 1Vision Science Program, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA. jburge@mail.cps.utexas.edu

The Journal of Neuroscience : the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience
|June 4, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Sensory calibration adjusts based on relative reliability, not just vision. This reliability-based model quantitatively predicts how senses adapt to maintain accurate environmental estimates over time.

More Related Videos

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects
07:32

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects

Published on: September 1, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects
07:32

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects

Published on: September 1, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Multisensory integration
  • Perceptual psychology
  • Computational neuroscience

Background:

  • Accurate environmental estimation relies on sensory calibration.
  • Traditionally, visual dominance (vision dictates calibration) was assumed.
  • The reliability-based model proposes calibration aligns with sensory reliability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantitatively assess the reliability-based model of sensory calibration.
  • To determine if relative sensory reliability predicts adaptation ratios.
  • To test if reliability-based calibration ensures minimum-variance estimates.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment involving visual, haptic, and combined visual-haptic slant perception.
  • Subjects judged surface slant (positive/negative).
  • Visual reliability was manipulated; haptic reliability was constant. Adaptation to conflicting visual-haptic stimuli was measured.

Main Results:

  • Sensory adaptation varied quantitatively with relative visual and haptic reliability.
  • When vision was more reliable, haptics adapted to vision.
  • When vision was less reliable, vision adapted to haptics, confirming the model.

Conclusions:

  • Sensory calibration is quantitatively governed by relative cue reliability.
  • The reliability-based model accurately predicts multisensory adaptation.
  • This mechanism ensures optimal, minimum-variance sensory estimates.