Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective01:23

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Feedback Inhibition00:46

Feedback Inhibition

Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II01:26

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II

Effective documentation is an integral part of nursing practice. Here are some essential guidelines to follow when documenting patient care:
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

THE JEREMIAH METZGER LECTURE: A BRIEF HISTORY OF EUGENICS IN AMERICA: IMPLICATIONS FOR MEDICINE IN THE 21<sup>ST</sup> CENTURY.

Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association·2019
Same author

A double negative: inhibition of hepatic Gi signaling improves glucose homeostasis.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2018
Same author

Allosteric Modulation of the Calcium-sensing Receptor Rectifies Signaling Abnormalities Associated with G-protein α-11 Mutations Causing Hypercalcemic and Hypocalcemic Disorders.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2016
Same author

The Calcilytic Agent NPS 2143 Rectifies Hypocalcemia in a Mouse Model With an Activating Calcium-Sensing Receptor (CaSR) Mutation: Relevance to Autosomal Dominant Hypocalcemia Type 1 (ADH1).

Endocrinology·2015
Same author

Research in academic medical centers: two threats to sustainable support.

Science translational medicine·2015
Same author

The stem cell wars: a dispatch from the front.

Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association·2013

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Operating and Biocontainment Procedures of a Facility for Laboratory Mice with a Natural Microbiome: Immunophenotyping Procedure
05:34

Operating and Biocontainment Procedures of a Facility for Laboratory Mice with a Natural Microbiome: Immunophenotyping Procedure

Published on: December 13, 2024

Commentary: new guidelines for NIH peer review: improving the system or undermining it?

Allen M Spiegel1

  • 1Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461, USA. allen.spiegel@einstein.yu.edu

Academic Medicine : Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
|June 4, 2010
PubMed
Summary

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) implemented changes to its peer review system, including support for new investigators and emphasis on innovation. These changes may challenge the goal of funding the best science by the best scientists.

More Related Videos

Improving Reproducibility to Meet Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 Guidelines in Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis
08:52

Improving Reproducibility to Meet Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 Guidelines in Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis

Published on: November 17, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Operating and Biocontainment Procedures of a Facility for Laboratory Mice with a Natural Microbiome: Immunophenotyping Procedure
05:34

Operating and Biocontainment Procedures of a Facility for Laboratory Mice with a Natural Microbiome: Immunophenotyping Procedure

Published on: December 13, 2024

Improving Reproducibility to Meet Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 Guidelines in Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis
08:52

Improving Reproducibility to Meet Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 Guidelines in Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis

Published on: November 17, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical research policy
  • Scientific funding mechanisms
  • Peer review evaluation

Background:

  • The National Institutes of Health (NIH) peer review system is a cornerstone of US biomedical research independence.
  • The system faces stresses, particularly during periods of flat funding.
  • NIH has modified its peer review process in response to identified stresses.

Discussion:

  • This commentary examines critiques of NIH peer review changes, specifically regarding new investigators and innovation criteria.
  • It analyzes these changes within the historical context of NIH resource allocation and priority setting.
  • The discussion evaluates whether these modifications align with the objective of funding "best science by the best scientists."

Key Insights:

  • Emphasis on innovation and support for new investigators in NIH peer review may conflict with the core goal of funding top-tier science.
  • Historical context is crucial for understanding NIH funding priorities and resource allocation.
  • Assessing the impact of peer review changes necessitates outcome measurement.

Outlook:

  • Future evaluations of NIH peer review should focus on measurable outcomes to determine the effectiveness of implemented changes.
  • Continued dialogue is needed to balance support for emerging talent with the pursuit of scientific excellence.
  • International emulation of the NIH system warrants careful consideration of its evolving dynamics.