Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

69.3K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
69.3K
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

863
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
863
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

71.7K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
71.7K
Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

503
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
503
What are Estimates?01:06

What are Estimates?

9.1K
It isn't easy to measure a parameter such as the mean height or the mean weight of a population. So, we draw samples from the population and calculate the mean height or mean weight of the individuals in the sample. This sample data acts as a representative measure of the population parameter. These sample statistics are known as estimates. 
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such...
9.1K
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

3.5K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
3.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Memorial minute for B. F. Skinner.

The Behavior analyst·2012
Same author

Activity anorexia: An interplay between basic and applied behavior analysis.

The Behavior analyst·2012
Same author

The antihistamine substance 2786 R.P.

British journal of pharmacology and chemotherapy·2008
Same author

Caffeine: behavioral effects of withdrawal and related issues.

Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association·2002
Same author

Foreword to Schedules of reinforcement. 1957.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2002
Same author

The frequency of caffeine withdrawal in a population-based survey and in a controlled, blinded pilot experiment.

Journal of clinical pharmacology·1999
Same journal

Neural Bases of Memory Development: Insights from Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same journal

Regional Heterogeneity of Brain Insulin Resistance: From Molecular Pathways to Neural Circuits.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same journal

Peripheral Nervous System Involvement in Parkinson's Disease: Peripheral Neuropathy, Neuromuscular Junction Dysfunction, and Clinical Implications.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same journal

Violence on the self: Exploring the intersection of trauma and identity among sexual and gender minorities from a neurobiological and developmental perspective to advance our understanding of PTSD, moral injury, and dissociation symptoms.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same journal

Meaning in life and biological functioning: A multisystem synthesis and agenda for future research.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same journal

Beyond diagnosis: Why and how virtual reality should be used in research on neurodevelopmental conditions?

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping
09:41

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping

Published on: April 21, 2023

2.4K

Extrapolation by proximate inference.

P B Dews1

  • 1Psychobiology Laboratory, Harvard University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02116-6078.

Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
|January 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Scientists must differentiate scientific extrapolation from regulatory safety assessments. Misapplying scientific methods to legal questions hinders establishing acceptable agent safety levels.

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K
Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping
09:41

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping

Published on: April 21, 2023

2.4K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K
Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.9K

Area of Science:

  • Regulatory Science
  • Risk Assessment
  • Scientific Methodology

Background:

  • Distinguishing between scientific extrapolation (e.g., astronomy) and legal/regulatory extrapolation is crucial.
  • Legal and regulatory extrapolation aims to establish acceptably safe levels of agents.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the critical differences between scientific and regulatory extrapolation.
  • To explain why scientists' attempts at purely scientific extrapolation fail in legal/regulatory contexts.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of extrapolation methodologies.
  • Review of scientific and technological information requirements in regulatory science.

Main Results:

  • Scientific extrapolation relies on theoretical models and observations.
  • Regulatory extrapolation requires integrating scientific data with legal and policy considerations.
  • Scientists often fail to contribute effectively when applying purely scientific extrapolation to regulatory questions.

Conclusions:

  • Effective regulatory extrapolation necessitates a distinct approach beyond pure scientific methods.
  • Scientists need to understand the specific requirements of legal and regulatory contexts to contribute meaningfully to safety assessments.