Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dose-effect approaches to risk assessment.

J R Glowa1

  • 1Clinical Neuroendocrinology Branch, NIMH, Bethesda, MD 20892.

Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
|January 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

New risk assessment methods offer improved accuracy over traditional approaches. These newer techniques provide more reliable dose-response estimates, especially with larger sample sizes, enhancing toxicological risk characterization.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A randomization test-based method for risk assessment in neurotoxicology.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2001
Same author

Morphine-induced conditioned taste aversions in the LEW/N and F344/N rat strains.

Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior·2001
Same author

Repeated exposure to inhaled toluene induces behavioral and neurochemical cross-sensitization to cocaine in rats.

Psychopharmacology·2001
Same author

Abuse liability of the anesthetic propofol: self-administration of propofol in rats under fixed-ratio schedules of drug delivery.

Psychopharmacology·2001
Same author

A comparison of cocaine, GBR 12909, and phentermine self-administration by rhesus monkeys on a progressive-ratio schedule.

Drug and alcohol dependence·2001
Same author

Regulation of benzodiazepine receptor binding and GABA(A) subunit mRNA expression by punishment and acute alprazolam administration.

Brain research·2001

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Environmental Health
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Traditional risk assessment relies on high-dose extrapolation or no observable effect levels (NOELs).
  • Low-dose extrapolation models can produce highly variable risk estimates.
  • NOELs are imprecise due to background variability and indeterminacy of true no-effect levels.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of newer risk assessment methods against traditional approaches.
  • To evaluate the impact of sample size on risk estimation accuracy.
  • To identify optimal methods for characterizing risks at low exposure levels.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized novel methods focusing on the lower, less error-prone portions of the dose-effect curve.
  • Compared risk estimates from two newer approaches with traditional methods.
  • Analyzed the influence of varying sample sizes on the divergence of risk estimates.

Main Results:

  • Newer methods produced consistent risk estimates with larger sample sizes at low risk levels.
  • Risk estimates diverged significantly between methods as risk levels increased and sample sizes decreased.
  • The choice of extrapolation function impacted the precision of traditional low-dose models.

Conclusions:

  • Newer risk assessment methodologies demonstrate superior performance, particularly with adequate sample sizes.
  • Traditional methods, including NOELs and low-dose extrapolation, exhibit limitations in precision and accuracy.
  • The study highlights the importance of sample size and method selection in accurate toxicological risk assessment.

Related Experiment Videos