Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Instinctive Drift01:05

Instinctive Drift

Instinctive drift refers to the tendency of animals to revert to their innate behaviors despite repeated reinforcement. Breland and Breland demonstrated this concept in an experiment with a raccoon. The raccoon was trained to pick up two coins and place them in a container in exchange for food. Initially, the raccoon learned to associate the coins with food, making them a conditioned stimulus or a substitute for food. However, over time, the raccoon became less willing to put the coins into the...
What is Behavior?00:54

What is Behavior?

Behaviors are actions that an organism engages in—they can be related to finding food, reproducing, defending against threats, and many other possible actions. Behaviors include activities related to the environment around the animal—such as migration—as well as social interactions within a species or population. Many behaviors involve motor output—that is, muscle movements—while others involve less visible actions, such as learning.
Mate Choice01:20

Mate Choice

Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.
Habitat Fragmentation02:31

Habitat Fragmentation

Habitat fragmentation describes the division of a more extensive, continuous habitat into smaller, discontinuous areas. Human activities such as land conversion, as well as slower geological processes leading to changes in the physical environment, are the two leading causes of habitat fragmentation. The fragmentation process typically follows the same steps: perforation, dissection, fragmentation, shrinkage, and attrition.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Learning in the honey bee waggle dance.

Learning & behavior·2023
Same author

Resource Availability Affects Seasonal Trajectories of Population-Level Learning.

The American naturalist·2022
Same author

Spectral sensitivities of the orchid bee Euglossa dilemma.

Journal of insect physiology·2022
Same author

Memory and the value of social information in foraging bumble bees.

Learning & behavior·2022
Same author

Bumble bees exhibit body size clines across an urban gradient despite low genetic differentiation.

Scientific reports·2022
Same author

Equivalent learning, but unequal participation: Male bumble bees learn comparably to females, but participate in cognitive assessments at lower rates.

Behavioural processes·2021
Same journal

Behavioral and physiological changes during the estrous cycle of socially housed female guinea pigs.

Behavioural processes·2026
Same journal

Flexible time-series analysis: A dynamically aware method for inferring directed dependencies in behavioral data.

Behavioural processes·2026
Same journal

Effects of group size and landmarks on escape behavior of three fish species.

Behavioural processes·2026
Same journal

Vocal individuality in two sympatric seabird species: The role of developmental strategy, analytical approach and sample size.

Behavioural processes·2026
Same journal

No evidence of sex-specific responses to chemosensory risk assessment cues in Harts rivulus.

Behavioural processes·2026
Same journal

Exploratory responses of rats to cage-mates and conspecifics from another cage in a habituation-dishabituation paradigm with multiple habituation stimuli.

Behavioural processes·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

Why do animals make better choices in patch-leaving problems?

David W Stephens1, Aimee S Dunlap

  • 1Ecology, Evolution & Behavior, University of Minnesota, 1987 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA. dws@umn.edu

Behavioural Processes
|June 5, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study reveals that simple rules of time and amount cannot explain differing animal choices between self-control and patch procedures. Current choice models may lack generality.

More Related Videos

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral economics
  • Animal behavior
  • Decision-making

Background:

  • The self-control procedure involves choices between smaller-sooner and larger-later options, often leading to suboptimal decisions.
  • The patch procedure simulates natural foraging, where animals choose between staying or leaving a resource patch.
  • Animals tend to achieve higher intake rates in patch procedures compared to self-control procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how a single set of choice mechanisms can produce different outcomes in self-control and patch procedures.
  • To test if the short-term rate rule can predict behavior in both procedures.
  • To evaluate the second-delivery hypothesis, suggesting delayed rewards in patch procedures drive better choices.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of animal choice behavior across two distinct experimental procedures: self-control and patch.
  • Experimental design focused on manipulating time and amount variables in choice options.
  • Analysis of long-term intake rates and decision patterns in each procedure.

Main Results:

  • Both the short-term rate rule and the second-delivery hypothesis were convincingly rejected by the experimental data.
  • Observed differences in choice behavior between self-control and patch procedures could not be explained by simple time and amount rules.
  • The findings indicate that existing models of choice may not be generalizable across different decision-making contexts.

Conclusions:

  • Simple heuristics based on time and amount are insufficient to account for the divergent choice patterns observed in self-control versus patch procedures.
  • The study challenges the universality of current theoretical frameworks for understanding animal decision-making.
  • Further research is needed to develop more comprehensive models that capture the nuances of choice behavior in ecologically relevant situations.