Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
[Comparison of two sources on mortality information in a retrospective cohort study on occupational cancer]
M Sala Serra1, J Sunyer Deu, G Pérez Albarracín
1Departament d'Epidemiologia i Salut Pública, Institut Municipal d'Investigació Mèdica. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Abstract:
In the context of a historical cohort study among workers in the pulp and paper industry, we examined the agreement between the underlying cause of death obtained from municipal mortality files and from the mortality register of Catalonia (n = 50 pairs). The percentage of simple agreement (P0) for major causes of death was 76%. The agreement and the Kappa index was higher for external causes (P0 = 98%; K = 0.87) and for cancer (P0 = 90%; K = 0.79). The agreement was moderate for mortality from circulatory diseases (K = 0.57). Agreement between 3 digit ICD codes was 48% but was higher for deaths from cancer (P0 = 67%). These results indicate that information on major causes of death and on specific causes of cancer retrieved from municipal mortality files may be used for the follow-up of historical cohort studies.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Longitudinal Research
