Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Collecting Sleep, Circadian, Fatigue, and Performance Data in Complex Operational Environments
Published on: August 8, 2019
Circadian rhythm in force tracking and in dual task costs
Isabelle Jasper1, Till Roenneberg, Andreas Häussler
1Clinical Neuropsychology Research Group (EKN), Clinic for Neuropsychology, München-Bogenhausen Hospital, Munich, Germany. Isabelle.Jasper@extern.lrzmuenchen.de
Human performance, including tracking precision and delay, exhibits a circadian rhythm, with the worst performance occurring around 4 AM. This rhythm is influenced by task complexity and individual differences, particularly during the circadian minimum.
Area of Science:
- Chronobiology
- Human Performance
- Cognitive Neuroscience
Background:
- Circadian rhythms significantly influence physiological and cognitive functions.
- Understanding time-of-day effects on motor control and attention is crucial for optimizing performance.
- Previous research has explored circadian variations in simple tasks, but complex visually guided tasks under dual-task conditions require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the circadian rhythm in force control during a visually guided tracking task.
- To investigate the impact of dual-tasking (tracking task with a memory task) on performance across the circadian cycle.
- To examine inter-individual variability in performance rhythms.
Main Methods:
- Nine healthy young males underwent a Constant Routine protocol for 40 hours of sustained wakefulness.
- Subjects performed a visually guided eye-hand coordination tracking task, adjusting grip force to match a changing target.
- Performance was assessed for precision and delay under single-task and dual-task conditions.
Main Results:
- Both tracking precision and delay demonstrated time-of-day-specific circadian rhythms, with performance declining around 04:00 h.
- Dual-task costs, indicating interference, were significant for tracking precision at the circadian minimum but minimal at midday.
- Tracking precision showed inter-individual differences, with some subjects exhibiting stable performance and others clear circadian rhythmicity.
Conclusions:
- Force control in visually guided tracking tasks exhibits significant circadian rhythmicity, impacting both precision and delay.
- Tracking precision is sensitive to divided attention and inter-individual variability, especially during the circadian nadir.
- Circadian variations in performance are evident even under complex task conditions, highlighting the pervasive influence of the internal biological clock.
Related Concept Videos
Circadian Rhythms and Gene Regulation
Circadian Rhythms and Gene Regulation
Chronopharmacokinetics: Circadian Rhythms and Influence on Drug Response
The time of drug administration is an important factor to consider, as it can influence the toxic dose of a drug. For example, a study conducted by Prins et al. in 1997 examined the effects of the timing of...
Biological Clocks and Seasonal Responses

