Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
Published on: July 3, 2020
Impact of non-normal random effects on inference by multiple imputation: A simulation assessment
Recai M Yucel1, Hakan Demirtas
1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University at Albany, SUNY, One University Place Room 139, Rensselaer, NY 12144, United States.
Multiple imputation using multivariate linear mixed-effects models offers accurate regression coefficient estimates for incomplete data. However, misspecifying random-effect distributions can bias variance and association estimates.
Area of Science:
- Statistics
- Biostatistics
- Data Analysis
Background:
- Multivariate linear mixed-effects models are vital for analyzing multilevel incomplete data using multiple imputation.
- The normality assumption of error terms and random effects is critical for accurate imputation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the plausibility of the normality assumption for subject-specific random effects.
- To investigate the performance of multiple imputation under a multivariate linear mixed-effects model with varying data characteristics.
Main Methods:
- Simulated incomplete data sets with diverse distributional properties.
- Analysis using multivariate linear mixed-effects models for multiple imputation.
- Assessment of regression coefficient, random-effect variance, and association measure estimation.
Main Results:
- Multiple imputation demonstrated well-calibrated procedures with negligible bias and accurate coverage rates for regression coefficients under moderate missing data.
- Estimation of random-effect variance and association measures was negatively impacted by random-effect distribution misspecification and the number of incompletely-observed variables.
- Adverse impacts included reduced coverage rates and increased biases in variance and association estimates.
Conclusions:
- Multivariate linear mixed-effects models provide reliable regression coefficient estimates in multiple imputation for incomplete data.
- Careful consideration of random-effect distribution assumptions is necessary to avoid biases in variance and association estimation.
Related Concept Videos
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...