Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the prevalence of...
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Bias01:22

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Investigating the reproducibility of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

A framework for assessing the trustworthiness of scientific research findings.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Science becomes trustworthy by constantly questioning itself.

PLoS biology·2025
Same author

Predicting the replicability of social and behavioural science claims in COVID-19 preprints.

Nature human behaviour·2024
Same journal

Symmetric Directional False Discovery Rate Control.

Statistical methodology·2017
Same journal

Latent Class Analysis of Incomplete Data via an Entropy-Based Criterion.

Statistical methodology·2016
Same journal

Incorporating auxiliary information for improved prediction using combination of kernel machines.

Statistical methodology·2014
Same journal

Efficient network meta-analysis: a confidence distribution approach.

Statistical methodology·2014
Same journal

A default prior distribution for contingency tables with dependent factor levels.

Statistical methodology·2014
Same journal

A note about the identifiability of causal effect estimates in randomized trials with non-compliance.

Statistical methodology·2014
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

Correlational biases in mean response latency differences.

N Sriram1, Anthony G Greenwald, Brian A Nosek

  • 1University of Virginia, United States.

Statistical Methodology
|June 8, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The mean latency difference (MLD) is often used to measure psychological constructs. However, consistent patterns in response latency data create biases, complicating MLD interpretation and requiring alternative analytical approaches.

More Related Videos

A Naturalistic Setup for Presenting Real People and Live Actions in Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Studies
07:43

A Naturalistic Setup for Presenting Real People and Live Actions in Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Studies

Published on: August 4, 2023

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
08:25

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults

Published on: October 19, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

A Naturalistic Setup for Presenting Real People and Live Actions in Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Studies
07:43

A Naturalistic Setup for Presenting Real People and Live Actions in Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Studies

Published on: August 4, 2023

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
08:25

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults

Published on: October 19, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychometrics
  • Human Information Processing

Background:

  • The mean latency difference (MLD) is a common metric for assessing psychological constructs.
  • MLD is calculated as the within-subject difference between mean response latencies on two tasks.
  • Understanding response latency patterns is crucial for accurate psychological measurement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the statistical properties of mean latency data.
  • To identify and explain common associations within mean latency data.
  • To evaluate the interpretability of the MLD in light of these associations.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of within-subject response latency data across multiple tasks.
  • Examination of correlations between mean latencies of different tasks.
  • Investigation of the relationship between mean and variance of mean latency across tasks.

Main Results:

  • A positive correlation exists between mean latencies on distinct tasks across subjects, attributed to individual differences in general information processing rates.
  • A positive correlation is observed between the mean and variance of mean latency across tasks; complex tasks exhibit higher average latency and variance.
  • These associations introduce biases in the interpretation of MLD, affecting correlations with task means, averages, external criteria, and other MLDs.

Conclusions:

  • Standard mean latency transformations do not fully resolve MLD biases.
  • An alternative approach using scale-invariant contrasts of within-subject response latency distributions is proposed.
  • This new method aims to provide a more robust measure for psychological constructs by addressing inherent biases in MLD.