Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Full-root Aortic Valve Replacement by Stentless Aortic Xenografts in Patients with Small Aortic Roots
Published on: May 21, 2017
[The impact of the "patient - prosthesis mismatch" in patients with aortic valve replacement.]
Ricardo Ferreira1, A Nobre, J Gallego
1Serviço de Cirurgia Cardiotorácica do Hospital de Santa Maria,CHLN, Lisboa.
Unlabelled:
Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch (PPM) is still a controversial matter in our days. We have PPM when the orifice area of an implanted aortic prosthesis valve is too small for the body surface area of an individual; this is, when the orifice area indexed to the body surface area is <0.8-0.9 cm2/m2.
Objective:
Assess the impact of Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch in the short term and 2 years follow up in a group of patients submitted to aortic valve replacement.
Material And Methods:
The authors present a retrospective study involving 343 patients with a mean age of 64,68+/-12,4 years that were submitted to aortic valve replacement between January 2005 and December 2008. Data were collected from patients' files and direct contact with the patients, comparing the groups with and without PPM and correlating them in terms of Euroscore, demographics, type of implanted prosthesis, surgical times, ICU and hospital stay. The data related to short term and long term mortality as well as the NYHA class evolution were also obtained.
Results:
Using the cut-off related to effective orifice area index 0,9 cm2/m2 we found PPM in 109 patients (31.7%). When comparing the two groups, we found that PPM seems to be related to advanced age (p=0.001), biological prosthesis (p=0.01) and, as expected, with use of valves less than 21 (p<0,05). A statistical significant difference was found for: 1) short-term mortality in patients with PPM (p<0,001), however, there were no differences in 2 years mortality and NYHA class between the groups; 2) aorta's cross clamping and extra corporeal circulation time (p=0.047 and p=0.036, respectively).
Insights
Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch (PPM) after aortic valve replacement is linked to higher short-term mortality but not long-term outcomes. This study found PPM impacts surgical times but not 2-year mortality or heart function.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Prosthetic Valve Research
- Clinical Outcomes Analysis
Context:
- Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch (PPM) occurs when an implanted aortic prosthesis is too small for a patient's body surface area.
- A PPM definition is an indexed orifice area <0.8-0.9 cm²/m².
- The clinical significance of PPM remains a subject of debate.
Purpose:
- To assess the short-term and 2-year impact of Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch (PPM) in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.
- To compare outcomes between patients with and without PPM.
Summary:
- A retrospective study of 343 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement found PPM in 31.7% of cases.
- PPM was associated with advanced age, biological prosthesis use, and smaller valve sizes.
- Short-term mortality was significantly higher in patients with PPM (p<0.001).
Impact:
- PPM correlated with increased aortic cross-clamping and extracorporeal circulation times.
- No significant differences in 2-year mortality or NYHA class were observed between groups.
- These findings suggest PPM's primary impact is on short-term surgical recovery rather than long-term survival or functional status.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
