Related Experiment Videos
Experiments for two MR imaging theories of motion phase sensitivity
1Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27103.
Radiology
|July 1, 1991
Summary
Two theories on motion-sensitive phase shifts in magnetic resonance (MR) imaging were tested. Transport integral solutions accurately predicted motion artifacts, unlike conventional methods, leading to artifact elimination with modified gradient waveforms.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Physics
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Motion artifacts in Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging arise from motion-sensitive phase shifts.
- Discrepancies exist between two theories predicting these motion-induced artifacts.
- Accurate gradient waveform design is crucial for minimizing motion contamination in MR imaging.
Purpose of the Study:
- To resolve the discrepancy between two theories of motion-sensitive phase shifts in MR imaging.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of different gradient waveform compensation strategies.
- To identify optimal methods for minimizing motion artifacts in MR imaging.
Main Methods:
- Computer integration of fundamental Bloch equations for MR imaging with motion.
- Simulation of constant and erratic motion using a monopolar gradient waveform test case.
- Comparison of transport integral solutions with conventional method-of-moments gradient moment nulling.
Main Results:
- Simulation images showed strong agreement with transport integral solutions for motion phase sensitivity.
- Artifacts were identified as time-of-flight oblique flow misregistration.
- Conventional gradient moment nulling increased motion artifacts compared to no compensation; second-integral zeroing eliminated artifacts.
Conclusions:
- Transport integral solutions provide accurate predictions for motion-sensitive phase shifts in MR imaging.
- Conventional gradient compensation methods can exacerbate motion artifacts.
- Modifying gradient waveforms by zeroing the second integral effectively eliminates motion artifacts.