Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sacroiliitis: MR imaging findings.

M D Murphey1, L H Wetzel, J M Bramble

  • 1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City 66103.

Radiology
|July 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Management of neonatal thrombocytopenia in a context of maternal antiplatelet alloimmunization: Expert opinion of the French-speaking working group.

Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie·2019
Same author

Distribution of Leaf-Feeding Beetles and Bean pod mottle virus (BPMV) in Illinois and Transmission of BPMV in Soybean.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

[Blood transfusion in neonatology: Study of practical aspects in 2016 in France, excluding acute bleeding or surgical care].

Transfusion clinique et biologique : journal de la Societe francaise de transfusion sanguine·2018
Same author

GEARS - An Objective Tool to Differentiate Robotic Surgical Skill and Experience.

Journal of minimally invasive gynecology·2016
Same author

TRANSCRIPTION. Recruitment of RNA polymerase II by the pioneer transcription factor PHA-4.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2015
Same author

A comparison of grafting materials in experimental bone grafts.

Orthopedics·2014
Same journal

Erratum for: Prediction of Lobar Emphysema Progression with a CT-Based Foundational Model.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Associations of MRI-derived Paraspinal IMAT and LMM with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: Results from a German Cohort.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Redefining the Clinical Role of MRI in Endometrial Cancer Staging.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

To Ablate or Not to Ablate: The Colorectal Liver Metastasis Question.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

The Limits of Radiologic Categorization in Pulmonary Nonsolid Nodules.

Radiology·2026
See all related articles

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging effectively detects sacroiliitis by revealing abnormal cartilage and bone erosions. This advanced imaging technique surpasses computed tomography (CT) in evaluating sacroiliac joints, especially when CT results are unclear.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Orthopedics

Background:

  • Sacroiliitis, inflammation of the sacroiliac joints, presents diagnostic challenges.
  • Conventional imaging techniques like computed tomography (CT) have limitations in fully characterizing sacroiliitis.
  • Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging offers high soft tissue contrast, potentially improving diagnostic accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of MR imaging versus CT in diagnosing sacroiliitis.
  • To define the characteristic MR imaging appearance of normal and inflamed sacroiliac joints.
  • To assess MR imaging's superiority in evaluating cartilage and detecting erosions associated with sacroiliitis.

Main Methods:

  • MR imaging was conducted on seven asymptomatic volunteers and 17 patients with clinical sacroiliitis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Findings from MR imaging were compared with CT scans of the same sacroiliac joints.
  • Analysis focused on cartilage signal intensity, erosions, and T1- and T2-weighted image characteristics.
  • Main Results:

    • MR imaging identified sacroiliitis in 20 sacroiliac joints (12 patients), showing abnormal cartilage signal (95%) and erosions (75%) on T1-weighted images.
    • T2-weighted images revealed increased signal intensity in the articulation (80%) and erosions (60%).
    • MR imaging demonstrated superiority over CT in cartilage evaluation and erosion detection, with four joints and two patients showing MR-positive sacroiliitis that was CT-negative.

    Conclusions:

    • MR imaging is a highly valuable tool for detecting sacroiliitis, particularly when CT findings are inconclusive.
    • Characteristic MR imaging findings include abnormal cartilage signal and erosions, with specific patterns on T1- and T2-weighted sequences.
    • The enhanced sensitivity of MR imaging for cartilage and erosions makes it a preferred modality for diagnosing sacroiliitis.