Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

05:52
Deployment and Retrieval of Mineral Samplers
Published on: January 20, 2026
A downhole passive sampling system to avoid bias and error from groundwater sample handling
Sanford L Britt1, Beth L Parker, John A Cherry
1ProHydro Inc., Fairport, New York 14450, USA. sandy.britt@prohydroinc.com
Environmental Science & Technology
|June 10, 2010
Summary
A novel In Situ Sealed (ISS) groundwater sampler minimizes disturbance and exposure, yielding more accurate volatile organic compound (VOC) and arsenic measurements compared to traditional methods.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Hydrogeology
- Analytical Chemistry
Background:
- Traditional groundwater sampling methods can introduce bias and errors through sample handling and exposure.
- Well purging, often required, can alter in-situ conditions and generate disposal concerns.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and evaluate a new downhole groundwater sampler designed to reduce bias and error.
- To assess the performance of the In Situ Sealed (ISS) sampler against conventional techniques.
Main Methods:
- The "In Situ Sealed" (ISS) device utilizes double end-opening bottles set in an open position for flow-through equilibration.
- Bottles are triggered to close downhole, enabling passive, non-purge sampling and sealed sample retrieval.
- Six field studies compared ISS sampling with traditional methods for various groundwater constituents.
Main Results:
- ISS sampling typically yielded higher volatile organic compound (VOC) concentrations compared to traditional methods.
- ISS results for arsenic showed less bias than both filtered and unfiltered purge samples.
- Inorganic constituents demonstrated parity between ISS and traditional sampling methods.
Conclusions:
- The ISS sampler is a versatile tool that enhances reproducibility and avoids low VOC recovery bias.
- This passive, non-purge sampling method simplifies procedures and eliminates purge water disposal issues.
- The ISS sampler offers a more accurate and reliable approach for groundwater quality assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Sampling Methods: Sample Types
Sampling materials are classified into three main types: solid, liquid, and gas.
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...
Contaminants and Errors
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...

