Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Microbial Interactions: Parasitism01:22

Microbial Interactions: Parasitism

Parasitism is a form of microbial interaction in which parasitic microbes exploit a host organism for nutrients and shelter, often at the host's expense. Unlike mutualistic relationships, where both organisms benefit, parasitism benefits only the parasite and harms the host.Classification of ParasitesMicrobial parasites are broadly classified based on their location relative to the host.Ectoparasites remain on the host’s surface, such as the skin or outer tissues, drawing nutrients...
Symbiosis00:58

Symbiosis

Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...
Microbial Interactions: Predation01:28

Microbial Interactions: Predation

Microbial predation refers to the process by which one microorganism kills and consumes another to obtain nutrients and energy. It encompasses both bacterial and protozoan predators. This interaction plays a crucial role in shaping microbial communities and regulating nutrient cycling.Bacterial Predators: Epibiotic vs. EndobioticBacterial predators are classified based on their mode of attack as either epibiotic or endobiotic. Epibiotic predators, such as Vampirococcus, attach to the surface of...
Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.Although predation is commonly associated with carnivory, for...
Microbial Interactions: Cooperation01:26

Microbial Interactions: Cooperation

Microbial cooperation involves beneficial interactions in which different species work together for individual or mutual advantage. These interactions can profoundly influence ecological dynamics and evolutionary processes, and they are essential to many pathogenic and symbiotic relationships.Nematode–Bacteria CooperationA striking example is the relationship between the Gram-negative bacterium Xenorhabdus nematophila and the parasitic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae. Juvenile nematodes...
Epiphytes, Parasites, and Carnivores02:40

Epiphytes, Parasites, and Carnivores

Plants often form mutualistic relationships with soil-dwelling fungi or bacteria to enhance their roots’ nutrient uptake ability. Root-colonizing fungi (e.g., mycorrhizae) increase a plant’s root surface area, which promotes nutrient absorption. While root-colonizing, nitrogen-fixing bacteria (e.g., rhizobia) convert atmospheric nitrogen (N2) into ammonia (NH3), making nitrogen available to plants for various biological functions. For example, nitrogen is essential for the biosynthesis of the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Host heterogeneity and unpredictability in parasite outbreaks.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Co-circulation and co-infection: parasite interactions across scales.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same author

Parasite responses to resource provisioning can be altered by within-host co-infection interactions.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Density-dependent network structuring within and across wild animal systems.

Nature ecology & evolution·2025
Same author

Host resources and parasite traits interact to determine the optimal combination of host parasite-mitigation strategies.

Ecology and evolution·2024
Same author

The impact of within-host coinfection interactions on between-host parasite transmission dynamics varies with spatial scale.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2024
Same journal

Lucky To Be Alive, Luckier to Breed: Lifetime Reproduction in Weddell Seals.

Ecology letters·2026
Same journal

Three-Dimensional Correlated Random Walks for Animal Movement and Habitat Selection.

Ecology letters·2026
Same journal

Higher-Order Interactions Can Promote Coexistence by Rewiring Intransitivities Into Competitive Networks.

Ecology letters·2026
Same journal

Plants That Evolved Under High Phylogenetic Diversity Have Higher Invasion Success, Particularly in Undisturbed Communities.

Ecology letters·2026
Same journal

Predictors of Food Web Resistance to Environmental Change.

Ecology letters·2026
Same journal

AI, Comparative Advantage, and the Next Decade of Ecological Research.

Ecology letters·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Collecting Marine Gnathiid Isopod Fish Parasites with Light Traps
06:43

Collecting Marine Gnathiid Isopod Fish Parasites with Light Traps

Published on: September 25, 2023

Detecting interspecific macroparasite interactions from ecological data: patterns and process.

Andy Fenton1, Mark E Viney, Jo Lello

  • 1School of Biological Sciences,University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool, L69 7ZB, UK. a.fenton@liverpool.ac.uk

Ecology Letters
|June 10, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Detecting interactions between co-infecting parasites is crucial but challenging. Current methods are unreliable, but a novel generalized linear mixed modelling (GLMM) approach offers a more robust way to identify these ecological interactions.

More Related Videos

Laboratory Protocol for Genetic Gut Content Analyses of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Using Group-specific rDNA Primers
10:17

Laboratory Protocol for Genetic Gut Content Analyses of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Using Group-specific rDNA Primers

Published on: October 5, 2017

Leveraging Micro-CT Scanning to Analyze Parasitic Plant-Host Interactions
06:23

Leveraging Micro-CT Scanning to Analyze Parasitic Plant-Host Interactions

Published on: January 12, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Collecting Marine Gnathiid Isopod Fish Parasites with Light Traps
06:43

Collecting Marine Gnathiid Isopod Fish Parasites with Light Traps

Published on: September 25, 2023

Laboratory Protocol for Genetic Gut Content Analyses of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Using Group-specific rDNA Primers
10:17

Laboratory Protocol for Genetic Gut Content Analyses of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Using Group-specific rDNA Primers

Published on: October 5, 2017

Leveraging Micro-CT Scanning to Analyze Parasitic Plant-Host Interactions
06:23

Leveraging Micro-CT Scanning to Analyze Parasitic Plant-Host Interactions

Published on: January 12, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Parasitology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Interspecific interactions among co-infecting parasites are of significant interest.
  • The extent of these interactions remains unknown due to a lack of validated detection methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate existing methods for detecting interspecific interactions between macroparasites.
  • To develop and validate a more reliable approach for identifying these interactions.

Main Methods:

  • Generated simulated abundance data for two interacting macroparasite species.
  • Tested various statistical approaches, including generalized linear mixed modelling (GLMM), for interaction detection.
  • Assessed method performance under correlated infection rates.

Main Results:

  • Current methods for detecting parasite interactions performed poorly, yielding false positives and false negatives.
  • The generalized linear mixed modelling (GLMM)-based approach demonstrated higher reliability in detecting interactions.
  • GLMM proved effective even when parasite infection rates were correlated.

Conclusions:

  • The unreliability of existing methods likely contributes to the uncertainty surrounding interspecific parasite interactions in natural systems.
  • The proposed GLMM approach offers a more robust and accurate tool for detecting these ecologically significant interactions.
  • Wider application of the GLMM method could clarify the prevalence and impact of interspecific parasite interactions.