Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System

Health Information Technology (HIT)
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:

Standards of Care II

Standards of Care II

Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:

Quality Assurance

Quality Assurance

Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Diagnostic sequence of chronic pain and severe mental illness: Relationship with mental health and hospitalization outcomes.

British journal of pain·2026

Same author

People with severe mental illness have low rates of screening for non-communicable diseases: Findings of a multi-country cross-sectional study in South Asia.

Global mental health (Cambridge, England)·2026

Same author

Primary care health screening in patients with severe mental illness: What influence do financial incentives have?

PLOS mental health·2026

Same author

Access and engagement with maternity, social care and mental health services for perinatal migrant women with no recourse to public funds and irregular status: A cross-sectional study using the eLIXIR born in South London, UK, maternity-child data linkage.

Public health·2026

Same author

Electronic Clinical Decision Support System for Stroke Risk Screening in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in Mental Health Care: Mixed Methods Study.

JMIR cardio·2025

Same author

Systematic review on the relationship between menopausal hormone replacement therapy, sarcopenia, and sarcopenia-related parameters.

Maturitas·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Quality and Outcomes Framework: smoke and mirrors?

Mark Ashworth¹, Maria Kordowicz

¹Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London School of Medicine, London, UK. mark.ashworth@kcl.ac.uk

Quality in Primary Care

|June 10, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

The Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) shows successes but may inflate scores through better data recording, not improved patient care. This study suggests refining QOF to enhance its public health impact.

More Related Videos

Conducting Respiratory Oscillometry in an Outpatient Setting

Conducting Respiratory Oscillometry in an Outpatient Setting

Published on: April 8, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Conducting Respiratory Oscillometry in an Outpatient Setting

Conducting Respiratory Oscillometry in an Outpatient Setting

Published on: April 8, 2022

Area of Science:

General Practice
Primary Care Medicine
Health Services Research

Background:

The Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) has been integral to UK general practice since 2004.
While QOF has achieved some successes, its susceptibility to 'gaming' raises concerns about its effectiveness as a primary care quality improvement tool.

Purpose of the Study:

To critically evaluate whether high QOF scores reflect genuine improvements in patient care or are artifacts of enhanced data recording.
To propose recommendations for enhancing the QOF as a public health initiative, addressing its identified limitations.

Main Methods:

This paper presents a critical analysis of the QOF framework.
It examines the relationship between QOF performance metrics and actual quality of care delivered.
Literature review and policy analysis were employed to assess QOF's impact.

Main Results:

High QOF scores may not consistently correlate with superior patient care, potentially indicating improved data management rather than enhanced clinical outcomes.
The framework's design presents challenges for its role as a primary driver of public health improvement in primary care.

Conclusions:

The QOF's current structure may incentivize superficial improvements or gaming, rather than substantive enhancements in patient care.
Revisions to the QOF are necessary to ensure it effectively drives meaningful quality improvement and public health benefits in primary care settings.