Long-term outcome of bifurcation stenting with drug-eluting stents

Yumiko Kanei1, Navin C Nakra, Yili Huang

  • 1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, NY 10003, USA. yumikanei@hotmail.com

Angiology
|June 10, 2010
PubMed

Insights

Treating coronary bifurcation lesions with two drug-eluting stents (DESs) showed acceptable major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) rates. Long-term data indicate this approach is safe and effective when necessary for complex cases.

Area of Science:

  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Cardiovascular Research
  • Medical Device Technology

Background:

  • Limited long-term clinical data exist on the safety and efficacy of using two drug-eluting stents (DESs) for coronary bifurcation lesions.
  • Coronary artery disease often involves complex bifurcation lesions requiring advanced stenting techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of treating coronary bifurcation lesions with two DESs.
  • To assess the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in patients undergoing two-stent bifurcation procedures.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective analysis of 124 consecutive patients who underwent bifurcation stenting with two DESs.
  • Clinical follow-up was obtained to record MACEs, defined as cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR).
  • Patients were categorized by stenting technique: crush, T stent, or kissing stent.

Main Results:

  • At one year, 17% of patients experienced MACEs (6% AMI, 12% TVR, 0% death).
  • At a mean follow-up of 22 months, 26% experienced MACEs (6% AMI, 19% TVR, 1% death).
  • No statistically significant risk factors for long-term MACEs were identified.

Conclusions:

  • Treating coronary bifurcation lesions with two DESs, when indicated, can be performed with an acceptable MACE rate.
  • The study suggests that two-stent strategies for bifurcation lesions are a viable option with manageable long-term outcomes.
  • Further research may refine patient selection and procedural techniques for optimal results.