Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Long-term cognition, achievement, socioemotional, and behavioral development of healthy late-preterm infants
Matthew J Gurka1, Jennifer LoCasale-Crouch, James A Blackman
1Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0717, USA. mgurka@virginia.edu
Insights
Healthy late-preterm infants show no significant cognitive or behavioral differences compared to full-term peers up to age 15. These findings suggest late preterm birth does not negatively impact child development outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric developmental psychology
- Neonatal outcomes research
Background:
- Late preterm birth (34-36 weeks gestation) is common.
- Previous research on long-term outcomes for healthy late preterm infants is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare cognitive, achievement, socioemotional, and behavioral outcomes in healthy late preterm versus full-term children.
- To assess developmental trajectories from age 4 through 15 years.
Main Methods:
- Prospective cohort study of 1298 children, including 53 born late preterm.
- Utilized the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised and Child Behavior Checklist.
- Repeated assessments from birth through age 15.
Main Results:
- No consistent significant differences were observed between late preterm and full-term children.
- Outcome measure differences were minimal, with confidence intervals indicating no meaningful disadvantage.
- Developmental trajectories were similar across both groups.
Conclusions:
- Healthy late preterm infants demonstrate comparable cognitive, achievement, and socioemotional development to full-term peers.
- Late preterm birth does not appear to impose a lasting developmental burden on otherwise healthy children.
Objective:
To compare healthy late-preterm infants with their full-term counterparts from age 4 through 15 years for numerous standard cognitive, achievement, socioemotional, and behavioral outcomes.
Design:
Prospective cohort study.
Setting:
National Institute of Child Health and Development Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development, 1991-2007.
Participants:
A total of 1298 children (53 born at 34-36 weeks' gestational age), and their families, observed from birth through age 15 years. None of the infants had major health problems before or immediately following birth, and all the infants were discharged from the hospital within 7 days.
Main Exposure:
Preterm status: children born late preterm (34-36 weeks) vs those born full term (37-41 weeks).
Main Outcome Measures:
Eleven standard outcomes measuring cognition, achievement, social skills, and behavioral/emotional problems using the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised and the Child Behavior Checklist, administered repeatedly through age 15 years.
Results:
No consistent significant differences were found between late-preterm and full-term children for these standard measures from ages 4 to 15 years. Through age 15 years, the mean difference of most of these outcomes hovered around 0, indicating, along with small confidence intervals around these differences, that it is unlikely that healthy late-preterm infants are at any meaningful disadvantage regarding these measures.
Conclusion:
Late-preterm infants born otherwise healthy seem to have no real burdens regarding cognition, achievement, behavior, and socioemotional development throughout childhood.
Related Concept Videos
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types
Stella Chess...
Information Processing Approach
Cognitive Development During Adulthood
Three Developmental Domains
Physical Development
Physical processes, also known as maturation, encompass the biological changes that occur across an individual's life. These changes begin with genetic inheritance and continue through various stages, including growth in height and weight,...
The Nativist Approach
Environmental Influences on Intelligence

