Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Quantification of the Immunosuppressant Tacrolimus on Dried Blood Spots Using LC-MS/MS
Published on: November 8, 2015
Results with cyclosporine monotherapy in long-term cardiac transplant recipients
F Sansone1, M Boffini, C Comoglio
1Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Turin, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Turin, Italy. fabrisans@katamail.com
Insights
Long-term heart transplant survivors showed similar outcomes on cyclosporine monotherapy versus double therapy. While triple therapy remains standard, this study suggests cyclosporine monotherapy may be a viable option for select patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Immunosuppression
- Transplantation
Background:
- Triple therapy is the established standard for immunosuppression post-heart transplantation.
- Limited data exists on the long-term efficacy and safety of cyclosporine monotherapy (CM).
- This study investigates CM in heart transplant recipients with over 5 years of survival.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term outcomes of cyclosporine monotherapy (CM) in heart transplant recipients.
- To compare the efficacy and safety of CM against double therapy (DT).
- To assess the utility of CM in patients surviving beyond 5 years post-transplant.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 219 heart transplant patients (1990-1998).
- 143 patients surviving >5 years were analyzed.
- 41 patients on double therapy (cyclosporine + Azathioprine) were matched with 41 patients on cyclosporine monotherapy.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in survival rates between CM and DT groups after a mean follow-up of 119.8 months.
- Major adverse events, including heart failure, malignancy, dialysis, infections, and Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV), were comparable.
- Long-term outcomes were similar for patients on CM and DT.
Conclusions:
- Triple therapy is recommended for heart transplant recipients due to its proven safety and efficacy.
- The study suggests that cyclosporine monotherapy may be a useful alternative for select long-term heart transplant survivors.
- Further research may explore the specific patient profiles that benefit most from CM.
Background:
Triple therapy is the gold standard after heart transplantation while few reports have described experiences with cyclosporine monotherapy (CM). We have analyzed our experience with CM in long-term heart transplant recipients, surviving >5 years.
Methods:
Of the 219 patients transplanted between January 1990 and December 1998, 143 survived >5 years (mean age, 49.6 +/- 10.4). There were 124 (86.7%) male subjects. Matching patients respect to follow-up length, we obtained 2 groups: group A of 41 patients on double therapy (DT; cyclosporine plus Azathioprine) and group B of 41 patients on CM.
Results:
After a mean follow-up of 119.8 +/- 32.2 months, we did not observe a significant difference in terms of survival and major events: heart failure, malignancy, dialysis, infections, and CAV.
Conclusion:
We strongly support the use of triple therapy in cardiac transplant recipients because of its known safety and efficacy. However, our experience with CM suggests the utility of this approach.
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Tissue Transplantation
The Biology of Tissue Transplantation
The biology of tissue transplantation hinges on the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules. These molecules...
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management