Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The modified Indiana pouch.

T E Ahlering1, A C Weinberq, B Razor

  • 1Department of Urology, University of Southern California School of Medicine.

Acta Urologica Belgica
|January 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: review and assessment of an emerging technique.

Surgical endoscopy·2005
Same author

Long-term outcome of detectable PSA levels after radical prostatectomy.

Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases·2005
Same author

Simplified technique with short and long-term followup of conversion of an ileal conduit to an Indiana pouch.

The Journal of urology·2001
Same author

Prostate needle biopsy infection after four or six dose ciprofloxacin.

The Canadian journal of urology·2000
Same author

Adenocarcinoma in an Indiana pouch urinary diversion.

The Journal of urology·2000
Same author

Vena caval resection for bulky metastatic germ cell tumors: an 18-year experience.

The Journal of urology·1997

The modified Indiana pouch offers excellent continence for urinary diversion with a low complication rate. This surgical technique provides reliable urinary management for patients needing diversion.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Innovation
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery

Background:

  • Urinary diversion is a critical procedure for patients with bladder dysfunction.
  • The Indiana pouch is a common type of continent urinary diversion.
  • Modifications to existing techniques are essential for improving patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a modified Indiana pouch procedure.
  • To assess complication and revision rates associated with the modified technique.
  • To determine the continence and catheterization success in patients undergoing this modified urinary diversion.

Main Methods:

  • A modified Indiana pouch was created using ileum and right colon segments.
  • Key modifications included detubularization, transcolonic ureteral reimplantation, and ileocecal junction plication.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The procedure was performed on 70 patients with follow-up ranging from 3 to 24 months.

    • Main Results:

    • 70 patients underwent the modified Indiana pouch procedure.
    • Low rates of hospitalization (5) and surgical revisions (4%) were observed.
    • Excellent continence was achieved, with easy catheterization of 400-800 cc volumes.

    Conclusions:

    • The modified Indiana pouch demonstrates a low complication and revision rate.
    • The technique provides excellent continence and functional outcomes for urinary diversion.
    • This modified Indiana pouch is a viable option for patients requiring cutaneous urinary diversion.