Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System

Health Information Technology (HIT)
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...

Quality Assurance

Quality Assurance

Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation

A successful patient outcome depends mainly on the evaluation stage of the nursing process. Evaluation determines effectiveness by reviewing what was done previously after the completion of nursing interventions. Every time a healthcare professional steps in or administers treatment, they must reassess or evaluate the action to ensure the intended result. During the evaluation phase, there are three probable patient outcomes:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Stimulating co-production in healthcare quality improvement: raising the interest of health professionals to collaborate with patients.

Frontiers in health services·2026

Same author

Improving complex systems with improve-mentation: challenges and solutions.

Frontiers in health services·2026

Same author

Applying implementation science to infectious disease emergency preparedness and response.

Frontiers in public health·2025

Same author

Applying a co-designed medication plan for safer medication treatment in older persons: a feasibility study.

Pilot and feasibility studies·2025

Same author

Implementing Personalized Cancer Medicine: Insights from a Qualitative Interview Study.

Journal of personalized medicine·2025

Same author

SIREN 2025 National Research Meeting: Advancing the Science of Social Care.

Health services research·2025

Same journal

A DEMATEL-based model to analyze causal factors affecting patients' informed consent.

International journal of health care quality assurance·2026

Same journal

Examining the relationship between perceived behavioral control and purchasing intention toward health insurance with a moderating effect of demographics.

International journal of health care quality assurance·2026

Same journal

Health insurance, health care utilization and health outcomes in Nigeria: evidence from DHS data.

International journal of health care quality assurance·2026

Same journal

Leveraging the MBNQA framework to advance quality assurance in healthcare.

International journal of health care quality assurance·2026

Same journal

Hospital service quality and patient loyalty: a comparative analysis of government and private hospitals in Chhattisgarh.

International journal of health care quality assurance·2026

Same journal

Technology meets trust: a UTAUT-driven exploration of AI-based medical device implementation in healthcare.

International journal of health care quality assurance·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Evolution and outcomes of a quality improvement program.

Johan Thor¹, Bo Herrlin, Karin Wittlöv

¹The Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. johan.thor@ki.se

International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance

|June 12, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study evaluated a Swedish hospital's quality improvement program over five years. While 58% of projects succeeded, effective quality measurement remains a challenge, highlighting the need for local adaptation and further research into gender differences in leadership.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Area of Science:

Healthcare Management
Quality Improvement Science
Organizational Behavior

Background:

Healthcare quality improvement programs are essential but their effectiveness and evaluation methods face ongoing uncertainty.
This study examines a five-year quality improvement program at a Swedish university hospital.

Purpose of the Study:

To assess the outcomes and evolution of a hospital-based quality improvement program.
To provide insights into the dynamic nature of healthcare improvement initiatives.
To address uncertainties in healthcare program effectiveness and evaluation.

Main Methods:

A case study approach was employed, utilizing data from clinical improvement projects and participant evaluations.
Quality indicators and participant feedback were collected over a five-year period.

Main Results:

58% of the 67 improvement projects demonstrated success.
Projects led by female doctors showed a higher success rate (91%) compared to those led by male doctors (51%).
Key challenges included a lack of dedicated time, while benefits included enhanced "big picture" understanding and improvements for patients and staff.

Conclusions:

The study provides evidence for the effectiveness of healthcare improvement programs, despite limitations in quality measurement reliability.
Further research is recommended on gender differences in improvement team leadership.
Effective evaluation of improvement programs should consider the local adaptation and application of methods.