Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

The Attentional Set Shifting Task: A Measure of Cognitive Flexibility in Mice
Published on: February 4, 2015
Clinical performance indicators: intolerance for variety?
Abhijit Basu1, Rosemary Howell, Deepa Gopinath
1University Hospital of South Manchester, Wythenshawe, UK. babuabhijitbasu@googlemail.com
Insights
Assessing National Health Service (NHS) hospital performance is challenging due to inconsistent clinical indicators. This study suggests using standardized activities for accurate hospital performance measurement.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Management
- Clinical Performance Measurement
- Hospital Administration
Background:
- National Health Service (NHS) hospitals face continuous scrutiny regarding performance.
- Independent bodies recommend clinical indicators for assessing non-financial hospital performance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically analyze the performance of a single UK hospital against recommended clinical indicators.
- To elucidate the difficulties in measuring clinical performance within the NHS.
Main Methods:
- Utilized 12 months of data presented to the Hospital Trust Board.
- Included previous years' data where available for comparative analysis.
Main Results:
- Hospital performance calculation proved extremely difficult due to complex ratios.
- Lack of standardization in indicators led to ambiguous interpretations of performance (better, worse, or indifferent).
Conclusions:
- Direct comparison with other hospitals was precluded due to a lack of similar analyses in existing literature.
- Highlights the inherent inconsistency in performance indicators, cautioning against reward-rebuke systems.
- Suggests using standardized, easily controlled activities or internal historical data for more reliable hospital performance measurement.
Purpose:
The performance of NHS U.K. hospitals is under continuous scrutiny as they are constantly under pressure to perform well. A recent document published by an independent body has recommended a host of clinical indicators to assess non-financial performance of hospitals. This study aims to critically analyse the performance of a single U.K. hospital against several of these recommended indicators.
Design/Methodology/Approach:
Data presented to the Hospital Trust Board for 12 months were used for this study. Previous years' data were used wherever available.
Findings:
Based on data analysis, this hospital's performance is extremely difficult to calculate. The indicators use complex ratios and due to lack of standardisation, the hospital performance could be interpreted as better, worse or indifferent.
Research Limitations/Implications:
This study analyses most of the recommended indicators. Literature review did not reveal a similar analysis of another hospital against these indicators which precludes comparison.
Practical Implications:
This study highlights the difficulty in comparing the performance of hospitals due to the inherent lack of consistency. Therefore it is apparent that any reward-rebuke system linked to performance should interpret the data with caution. It is therefore suggested that easy to control single value activities and standardised routine activities could be used to measure hospital performance. Alternatively, the hospital could compare with its own statistics from previous years.
Originality/Value:
Literature acknowledges the difficulties in measuring clinical performance. This paper elucidates these difficulties applied to the NHS and suggests alternatives.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Drug Product Performance: In Vitro–In Vivo Correlation
Dosage Regimen: Individualization
Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications

