Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026
Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose (MED) Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response
Published on: October 3, 2019
Non-invasive bioengineering methods in an intervention study in 1020 male metal workers: results and implications for
Birgitta Kütting1, Wolfgang Uter, Thomas Baumeister
1Institute and Outpatient Clinic of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. birgitta.kuetting@ipasum.uni-erlangen.de
Background:
Measurements of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) as an indicator of skin barrier function and colorimetry for quantifying erythema have been recommended for monitoring persons at risk of occupational hand dermatitis.
Objective:
This study examines the practicability and usefulness of biophysical measurements at the workplace. PATIENTS/MATERIAL/METHODS: A sample of 1020 male metal workers was enrolled; 800 participants were followed up for 1 year. TEWL results and colorimetry (a* value), respectively, were used as effectiveness outcomes, comparing the findings in the four study arms (skin care, skin protection, both combined, and control group).
Results:
At 1 year follow-up, the TEWL was slightly but significantly lower in the group of participants randomized for application of barrier cream alone, indicating a protective effect. However, addressing both the individual absolute change of a* value and the differences of TEWL (delta-TEWL) of the dominant hand over the study period, no significant difference was found between the four groups.
Conclusions:
Dermatological examinations at the workplace cannot be replaced by bioengineering techniques. The supplementary benefit is apparently low, possibly because of difficulties in achieving standardized measurement conditions and other technical reasons.
