Related Concept Videos
Borderline Personality Disorder
Genetic and Environmental Contributions
Borderline Personality...
Working Memory
Information Processing Approach
Language and Cognition
Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory
Intellectual Disability
You might also read
Related Articles
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
The Impact of an Interactive Art Session on Resident Physicians' Views Towards Treating Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Qualitative Analysis.
Securing Educational Support for Children With Rare Genetic Conditions: Mothers' Experiences and Impacts on the Family.
Belonging in Reduced-Size Classrooms: Student Outcomes Among Chinese Upper Secondary Students With Intellectual and Other Documented Disabilities.
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Assessing Working Memory in Children: The Comprehensive Assessment Battery for Children – Working Memory (CABC-WM)
Published on: June 12, 2017
Working memory and executive function profiles of individuals with borderline intellectual functioning.
1Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK. t.p.alloway@stir.ac.uk
Students with borderline intellectual functioning exhibit widespread working memory and executive function deficits. Visuo-spatial working memory and the Sorting task effectively identify these students, informing educational support.
More Related Videos
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
- Educational Psychology
Background:
- Students with borderline intellectual functioning (IQ 70-85) may have impaired cognitive skills.
- Understanding these deficits is crucial for effective educational interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate pervasive working memory deficits in students with borderline intellectual functioning.
- Identify specific executive function impairments and tasks that highlight these deficits.
- Determine which executive function tasks can differentiate low-IQ students from typically developing peers.
Main Methods:
- Age-matched comparison between students with borderline intellectual functioning (low-IQ) and typically developing students.
- Administration of diverse working memory and executive function assessments.
- Analysis of cognitive performance differences between the two groups.
Main Results:
- Students with low IQ demonstrated pervasive deficits in both working memory and executive functions.
- Visuo-spatial working memory and the Sorting task emerged as key predictors.
- These tasks reliably classified students with low IQ.
Conclusions:
- The findings highlight significant cognitive challenges for students with borderline intellectual functioning.
- Educational strategies should address identified working memory and executive function weaknesses.
- Accurate diagnosis and tailored classroom support are essential for academic success.

