Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-II01:18

Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-II

An interdisciplinary team includes many healthcare professionals working together and utilizing their skills, knowledge, and expertise to provide holistic and quality patient care. Here are a few more healthcare professionals.
Physical Therapist
A physical therapist (PT) aims to restore function or prevent additional impairment in a patient following an injury or disease. Massage, heat, cold, water, sonar waves, exercises, and electrical stimulation are some treatments used by PTs to treat...
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

STAT-C, an innovative training workshop supporting management of sick leave related to common mental health disorders: A case study for spontaneous scaling in primary care.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Assessing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using OPTION-12 and OPTION-5.

BMJ evidence-based medicine·2026
Same author

AI Methods for Implementation Science (AIM-IS): developing a framework, toolkit, and reporting standard for the responsible use of AI in implementation practice and research.

Implementation science : IS·2026
Same author

Sex and gender reporting and differences in trials evaluating patient decision aids: a secondary analysis of systematic review with meta-analysis.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Tracking the Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Implementation Science: Protocol for a Living Scoping Review of Applications, Evaluation Approaches and Outcomes.

F1000Research·2026
Same author

Validation of PREM-PS, a patient-reported experience instrument, in a randomized controlled trial of pregnant women undergoing prenatal screening.

Journal of patient-reported outcomes·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

Dyadic OPTION: Measuring perceptions of shared decision-making in practice.

Emma Melbourne1, Stephen Roberts, Marie-Anne Durand

  • 1Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4YS.

Patient Education and Counseling
|June 12, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Shared decision-making (SDM) in medical consultations requires a dyadic assessment approach. This study introduces the dyadic OPTION instrument, revealing that SDM behaviors depend on both doctor and patient interactions.

More Related Videos

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Medical Communication
  • Health Services Research
  • Patient-Centered Care

Background:

  • Current models emphasize shared decision-making (SDM) in medical consultations.
  • Evidence on SDM effectiveness is conflicting, potentially due to observer-based assessments.
  • This study addresses limitations in assessing SDM.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To empirically assess patient and doctor involvement in medical consultations.
  • To evaluate the utility of a novel dyadic OPTION instrument for measuring SDM.
  • To explore the dyadic nature of SDM behaviors.

Main Methods:

  • 36 simulated medical consultations were conducted.
  • General practitioners and standardized patients participated.
  • Both observer and dyadic OPTION instruments were utilized for assessment.

Main Results:

  • Shared decision-making behaviors were found to be dependent on the doctor-patient dyad.
  • Individual assessments did not fully capture SDM dynamics.
  • A dyadic approach to measurement is supported by the findings.

Conclusions:

  • A dyadic approach is necessary for accurately assessing shared decision-making.
  • The dyadic OPTION instrument is a novel tool for evaluating SDM.
  • This study advances the understanding of SDM in clinical practice.