Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...

Methods of Documentation VII: EMR

Methods of Documentation VII: EMR

Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) primarily center around electronically documenting patients' health information within a single healthcare organization or practice. They contain essential clinical data related to a patient's medical history, diagnoses, medications, treatment plans, lab results, and other pertinent information relevant to the specific encounter or episode of care. EMRs are designed to streamline documentation and workflow processes within individual healthcare settings,...

Assessment of Respiration

Assessment of Respiration

The respiratory system's basic structures and primary functions lay the foundation for nurses' comprehensive respiratory assessments. This assessment includes subjective and objective data to gauge the patient's respiratory health.
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like asthma or COPD,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Fostering conversation and co-regulation: how medical students experience co-creating narrative feedback.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026

Same author

CBME As a Philosophy of Training: Balancing Fidelity and Flexibility in Emergency Medicine.

AEM education and training·2026

Same author

Diagnostic Challenges in Pediatric Dermatologic Presentations Among Pediatricians.

Pediatric dermatology·2026

Same author

Developing Resident-Sensitive Quality Measures for Internal Medicine.

JAMA network open·2026

Same author

Should Do or Could Do? Exploring How Trainees Make Sense of When Supervisors Change Their Proposed Clinical Approach.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026

Same author

Beyond the scalpel: redefining surgical training for tomorrow: Canadian Conference for the Advancement of Surgical Education, Oct. 16-17, 2025 Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

A pediatrics-based instrument for assessing resident education in evidence-based practice.

Lauren Chernick¹, Martin Pusic, Heather Liu

¹Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.

Academic Pediatrics

|June 12, 2010

Summary

A new assessment tool reliably measures evidence-based practice (EBP) knowledge and skills in pediatric residents. This validated instrument helps educators track the effectiveness of EBP curricula for pediatric training.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Medical Education
Pediatrics
Evidence-Based Practice

Background:

Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is a core component of pediatric residency training.
A validated assessment tool specifically for EBP in pediatric residents was previously unavailable.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and validate an assessment instrument for EBP knowledge and skills in pediatric residents.
To provide a tool for evaluating the impact of EBP curricula in pediatric education.

Main Methods:

An assessment instrument was designed with sections on demographics, comfort, self-reported practice, and EBP knowledge using pediatric scenarios.
The instrument was administered to medical students, pediatric interns, residents, and expert tutors.
psychometric properties including internal consistency, interrater reliability, content validity, and construct validity were evaluated.

Main Results:

The assessment demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = .80) and high interrater reliability (kappa = 0.94).
Comfort and self-reported EBP practice increased with expertise and prior EBP experience.
Knowledge scores significantly improved across training levels, from medical students to expert tutors, correlating with EBP education.

Conclusions:

A reliable and valid instrument for assessing pediatric residents' EBP knowledge and skills has been developed.
This tool can effectively assist pediatric educators in monitoring and assessing EBP curriculum outcomes.