Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Stage shifts in national lung adenocarcinoma and the impact of opportunistic self-initiated LDCT screening in Taiwan: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific·2026
Same author

Evaluating risk prediction models: the Predictiveness curve and its geometric summaries.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Age-related differences in outcomes and tumor characteristics of ultra-rare sarcomas: A Nation-wide Study.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2026
Same author

Association of Cancer Care Quality Certification With Survival Across Multiple Cancer Types: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Taiwan.

International journal of cancer·2026
Same author

Burden and Health System Challenges in MASLD Across East and Southeast Asia: A Narrative Review.

Health science reports·2026
Same author

Explainable artificial intelligence for personalized prognosis in pancreatic cancer: A nationwide study from Taiwan.

PLOS digital health·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

Weighing the causal pies in case-control studies.

Shu-Fen Liao1, Wen-Chung Lee

  • 1Research Center for Genes, Graduate Institute of Epidemiology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Annals of Epidemiology
|June 12, 2010
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces causal-pie weights (CPWs) to quantify the relative importance of different causal pathways in disease. This method clarifies complex disease causation and aids public health interventions.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Causal inference
  • Public health

Background:

  • Rothman's causal pies model is a framework for understanding disease etiology.
  • Previous methods like proportion of diseased subjects who develop the disease due to classes of sufficient causes (PDCs) do not directly correspond to causal pie classes.
  • There is a need for methods to quantify the contribution of specific causal pathways.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and demonstrate the estimation of "causal-pie weights" (CPWs).
  • To assign a unique weight to each class of causal pies within Rothman's framework.
  • To provide a method for quantifying the relative importance of different causal pathways.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a non-negative linear odds model constrained to odds ratios (ORs) ≥ 1.
  • Applied additive or superadditive interactions between risk factors.
  • Calculated population attributable fractions and subsequently CPWs using published case-control data.

Main Results:

  • Causal-pie weights (CPWs) were successfully estimated.
  • CPWs effectively quantify the relative importance of distinct causal pie classes.
  • Demonstrated the methodology using real-world case-control data.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed CPW method clarifies complex, multi-factorial disease causation.
  • This approach offers valuable insights for designing effective public health intervention strategies.
  • Enhances understanding of disease etiology and risk factor interactions.