Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Investigating Single Molecule Adhesion by Atomic Force Spectroscopy
Published on: February 27, 2015
Mechanistic studies of AFM probe-driven Suzuki and Heck molecular coupling
1Physical and Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QZ, UK. jason.davis@chem.ox.ac.uk
Abstract:
The initiation and high resolution control of surface confined chemical reactions would be both beneficial for nanofabrication and fundamentally interesting. In this work, mechanistic aspects of spatially confined Suzuki and Heck 'catalytic nanolithography' are investigated by varying the experimental parameters and noting their effects on apparent reactivity and lithographic yield. A variety of molecular couplings can be driven by the activated scanning probe with linewidths ultimately limited by its functional apex. On ramping the speed at which the probe traverses the surface confined reagent, one reaches a limit where the catalytic chemistry becomes limiting and reaction rates can be estimated. Self-assembled monolayer (SAM) confined bromide reagents are observed to be more labile than their iodide analogues in Suzuki couplings. With Heck reactions, coupling rates are observed to be faster with the styrene surface confined than in the 'inverted configuration' with an aryl halide SAM, possibly because the accepted (solution phase) rate-determining step is bypassed in the former configuration. For both Heck and Suzuki coupling reactions, calculations indicate that catalyst turnover numbers per nanoparticle are an order of magnitude or more greater within the confines of the AFM probe-surface junction compared to solution phase reactions. A PVP matrix model is presented to account for these observations and the mechanism of catalytic nanolithography.
Related Concept Videos
Atomic Force Microscopy
The AFM Probe
The probe is regarded as the heart of any AFM setup and comprises the...
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene π orbitals.
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...

