Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Time sampling: a methodological critique.

J Mann1, T Ten Have, J W Plunkett

  • 1Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109.

Child Development
|April 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Self-Compassion and Parenting in Mothers and Fathers with Depression.

Mindfulness·2016
Same author

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Induced Airway Epithelial Injury Drives Fibroblast Activation: A Mechanism in Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2015
Same author

Proliferating subcutaneous nodules in a 12-year-old girl.

Clinical and experimental dermatology·2015
Same author

Corrigendum: NFκB1 is a suppressor of neutrophil-driven hepatocellular carcinoma.

Nature communications·2015
Same author

A national survey of Mohs micrographic surgery in the U.K.

The British journal of dermatology·2015
Same author

NFκB1 is a suppressor of neutrophil-driven hepatocellular carcinoma.

Nature communications·2015

Time sampling, a common method in developmental studies, inaccurately estimates behavior duration and frequency. Researchers suggest using more valid methods like continuous sampling for accurate social behavior analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Ethology
  • Behavioral Observation

Background:

  • Time sampling is widely used in developmental studies to observe social behavior.
  • This method aims to estimate behavior frequency, duration, and group differences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of time sampling compared to continuous sampling.
  • To identify conditions under which time sampling errors are most significant.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of time sampling and continuous sampling techniques.
  • Examination of error rates based on behavior bout length and interval duration.

Main Results:

  • Time sampling significantly underestimates or overestimates actual behavior durations and frequencies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Individual and group differences in behavior can be misrepresented by time sampling.
  • Error rates escalate with shorter behavior bout lengths and longer sampling intervals.

    • Conclusions:

    • Time sampling is unreliable for accurately measuring social behaviors, especially short-duration interactions like those in mother-infant studies.
    • Alternative methods such as scan, point, or continuous sampling are recommended for greater validity in behavioral research.