Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Bonferroni Test

Bonferroni Test

The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II

The Wald-Wolfowitz runs test, commonly referred to as the runs test, is a nonparametric test used to assess the randomness of ordered data. The test evaluates the number of runs, which are consecutive sequences of similar elements within the data. If the number of runs is significantly higher or lower than expected, the data is considered non-random, indicating a detectable pattern or structure.
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and 0s. In...

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I

The Wald-Wolfowitz test, also known as the runs test, is a nonparametric statistical test used to assess the randomness of a sequence of two different types of elements (e.g., positive/negative values, successes/failures). It examines whether the order of the elements in a sequence is random or if there is a pattern or trend present. This nonparametric test applies to any ordered data despite the population and sample data distribution, even if a higher sample size is available.
The test works...

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Letter to the Editor on "Group-by-Treatment Interaction Effects in Comparative Bioavailability Studies".

The AAPS journal·2024

Same author

Consistency ensured test strategies for supportive evidence of treatment efficacy in noninferiority clinical trials.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2017

Same author

Consistency-ensured parametric tests for critical events of composite endpoints.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2017

Same author

Tutorial on statistical considerations on subgroup analysis in confirmatory clinical trials.

Statistics in medicine·2016

Same author

Methods for efficacy evaluations of antibacterial treatments in multiple body-site infection trials.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2016

Same author

Validity of the Hochberg procedure revisited for clinical trial applications.

Statistics in medicine·2015

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

A consistency-adjusted alpha-adaptive strategy for sequential testing.

Mohamed Alosh¹, Mohammad F Huque

¹Division of Biometrics III, Office of Biostatistics, OTS, CDER, FDA, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA. Mohamed.Alosh@fda.hhs.gov

Statistics in Medicine

|June 17, 2010

Summary

This study introduces a new statistical strategy for clinical trials to ensure consistent results between endpoints. The Consistency-Adjusted Alpha-Adaptive Strategy (CAAAS) improves interpretation by adapting statistical significance based on initial findings.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

Area of Science:

Biostatistics
Clinical Trial Design
Statistical Methodology

Background:

Clinical trials often face interpretation challenges when multiple endpoints yield inconsistent results.
Lack of consistency among clinically relevant endpoints can complicate the assessment of treatment efficacy.

Purpose of the Study:

To introduce the concept of endpoint consistency at the clinical trial design stage.
To investigate the impact of implementing a consistency criterion in the statistical analysis plan.
To propose a novel methodology for managing multiple endpoints in clinical trials.

Main Methods:

Introduced a Consistency-Adjusted Alpha-Adaptive Strategy (CAAAS) for hierarchically ordered endpoints.
Developed a method where endpoint testing proceeds only if a pre-specified consistency criterion is met.
Incorporated adaptive alpha allocation and considered endpoint correlation for significance and power calculations.

Main Results:

The proposed methodology allows for sequential testing of endpoints contingent on meeting consistency criteria.
CAAAS enables adaptive adjustment of the alpha level for subsequent endpoints based on earlier results.
The strategy accounts for correlations between endpoints to refine significance and power assessments.

Conclusions:

The Consistency-Adjusted Alpha-Adaptive Strategy (CAAAS) offers a flexible framework for clinical trial analysis.
CAAAS provides a unified approach, encompassing several existing multiplicity adjustment methods.
The methodology ensures control of Type I error rate and enhances statistical power in clinical trials.