Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026
11:51
An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
Dental implants immediate loading versus the standard 2-staged protocol: an experimental study in dogs
Mansour Rismanchian1, Bijan Movahedian Attar, Sayed Mohammad Razavi
11 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences and Torabinejad Dental Research Center, Isfahan, Iran.
The Journal of Oral Implantology
|June 18, 2010
Summary
Immediate loading of dental implants shows comparable results to traditional two-stage methods. This approach is not perilous for osseointegration, bone-implant contact, or new bone formation.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Oral Surgery
- Biomaterials Science
Background:
- The pursuit of reduced dental implant treatment duration has popularized immediate loading protocols.
- Evaluating immediate loading against conventional two-stage implant placement is crucial for clinical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare immediate implant loading with the two-stage method.
- Assess clinical, histological, and histomorphometric outcomes of both techniques.
Main Methods:
- 12 premolars from 3 dogs were extracted, followed by implant placement after 3 months.
- Evaluated bone-implant contact (BIC), implant stability quotient (ISQ), bone type, and marginal bone loss (MBL) in both unloaded (n=6) and immediately loaded (n=6) implants.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were observed in BIC, ISQ, mesial MBL, or bone types between the groups.
- Distal marginal bone loss was higher in the immediately loaded group.
Conclusions:
- Immediate implant loading appears safe regarding osseointegration, BIC, and new bone formation.
- Further investigation into distal bone changes with immediate loading may be warranted.