Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Performing Repeated Intraoperative Impedance Telemetry Measurements during Cochlear Implantation

Performing Repeated Intraoperative Impedance Telemetry Measurements during Cochlear Implantation

Published on: August 4, 2023

Frequency and electrode discrimination in children with cochlear implants.

Jonathan C Kopelovich¹, Marc D Eisen, Kevin H Franck

¹Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States. jokopelo@gmail.com

Hearing Research

|June 18, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

The Cochlea

The Cochlea

The cochlea is a coiled structure in the inner ear that contains hair cells—the sensory receptors of the auditory system. Sound waves are transmitted to the cochlea by small bones attached to the eardrum called the ossicles, which vibrate the oval window that leads to the inner ear. This causes fluid in the chambers of the cochlea to move, vibrating the basilar membrane.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Voluntary Field Recall of Advanced Bionics HiRes Cochlear Implants: A Single-Institution Experience.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2022

Same author

Fractionated Proton Radiation Therapy and Hearing Preservation for Vestibular Schwannoma: Preliminary Analysis of a Prospective Phase 2 Clinical Trial.

Neurosurgery·2022

Same author

Implementation of Mobile Audiometry During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery·2021

Same author

Patient Report of Hearing in Neurofibromatosis Type 2: Recommendations for Clinical Trials.

Neurology·2021

Same author

Predicting Depression From Hearing Loss Using Machine Learning.

Ear and hearing·2021

Same author

Regulation of Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids - Deafening Silence from the FDA.

The New England journal of medicine·2020

Children with cochlear implants show improved auditory discrimination with lower frequencies and higher electrode intensity. Developmental changes in signal processing aid acoustic stimulus discrimination.

Area of Science:

Auditory Neuroscience
Pediatric Audiology
Cochlear Implant Technology

Background:

Cochlear implants (CIs) aim to restore hearing but face challenges in auditory perception, particularly in children.
Understanding frequency and electrode discrimination limits is crucial for optimizing CI device fitting and rehabilitation.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop reliable pediatric psychophysical methods for assessing frequency and electrode discrimination in children with CIs.
To compare the auditory discrimination abilities of implanted children with those of normal-hearing children.

Main Methods:

Utilized a two-alternative, adaptive, forced-choice design with a video game interface for psychophysical testing.
Assessed frequency discrimination in 29 implanted and 68 normal-hearing children across various frequencies.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Performing Repeated Intraoperative Impedance Telemetry Measurements during Cochlear Implantation

Performing Repeated Intraoperative Impedance Telemetry Measurements during Cochlear Implantation

Published on: August 4, 2023

Evaluated electrode discrimination in 34 implanted children at different electrode locations and stimulation intensities.

Main Results:

Older children demonstrated better frequency discrimination than younger children in both groups.
Implanted children exhibited poorer overall frequency discrimination and showed learning effects at older ages compared to hearing peers.
Frequency discrimination improved at lower frequencies (smaller Weber fractions).
Electrode discrimination enhanced with stimulus intensity in older, but not younger, implanted children.

Conclusions:

Developmental changes in auditory signal processing influence the discrimination of acoustic stimuli.
For pediatric CI users, auditory discrimination is enhanced by lower frequencies and higher electrode stimulation intensity.
Spatial separation may not be the primary factor for creating discriminable electrical stimuli in this population.