Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
Overcoming psychological barriers to good discovery decisions
Andrew T Chadwick1, Matthew D Segall
1Tessella Plc, Stanhope Bretby, Burton upon Trent, Staffs, UK. andrew.chadwick@tessella.com <andrew.chadwick@tessella.com>
Cognitive biases can negatively impact research and development (R&D) decision-making, leading to increased costs and delays. Implementing evidence-based medicine principles and utilizing feedback in simulated environments can improve R&D team performance and objectivity.
Area of Science:
- Decision Science
- Cognitive Psychology
- Research and Development Management
Background:
- Cognitive biases are well-documented psychological phenomena that can impair objective decision-making.
- These biases pose significant risks to the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of research and development (R&D) processes.
- Unaddressed biases can lead to unexpected setbacks and inflated operational expenditures in R&D.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the risks associated with common cognitive biases in R&D decision-making.
- To explore the application of evidence-based medicine principles as a model for mitigating bias in R&D.
- To identify potential strategies for enhancing objectivity and improving R&D outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Review of common cognitive biases and their specific impact on R&D decision-making.
- Comparative analysis of current R&D practices versus the structured approach of evidence-based medicine.
- Exploration of feedback mechanisms and computational tools for bias mitigation.
Main Results:
- Four prevalent cognitive biases were identified as particularly detrimental to R&D decision-making.
- Evidence-based medicine offers a framework for structured, objective decision-making applicable to R&D.
- Simulated environments providing performance feedback can enhance team decision-making in compound selection and screening.
Conclusions:
- Mitigating cognitive biases is crucial for improving R&D performance and reducing costs.
- Adopting principles similar to evidence-based medicine can foster greater objectivity in R&D.
- Feedback and computational tools show promise in supporting more rational and effective R&D decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Drug Discovery: Overview
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Halo Effect
Cognitive Learning
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...