Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Missing productivity gains in the Medicare physician Fee Schedule: where are they?
Jerry Cromwell1, Nancy McCall, Kathleen Dalton
1Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. jcromwell@rti.org
Abstract:
The Medicare Fee Schedule with payments for thousands of visits and procedures is updated periodically for the work component of changes in physician relative work. Three 5-year reviews of physician work by Medicare have been biased against finding productivity gains and reductions in physician work relative values. The authors present four studies showing shorter physician times with patients in their offices and in the operating room, increases in surgeons' self-reported total work in spite of declining operating room times, and growing numbers of costly handoffs to nonsurgeons, while surgeons receive full payment for postoperative follow-up with patients. Substantial savings exist in the fee schedule if productivity gains from greater delegation to ancillary staff and specialists, reengineering of services, and rapid learning by experience with new technologies were integrated into the periodic reviews.
Insights
Medicare physician work relative values are outdated, missing productivity gains. Revisions could yield substantial savings by accounting for reduced physician time and increased delegation.
Area of Science:
- Health Economics
- Medical Policy
- Physician Workforce Studies
Background:
- The Medicare Fee Schedule (MFS) is periodically updated to reflect changes in physician work.
- Past MFS reviews have shown bias against recognizing physician productivity improvements.
- Current payment structures may not accurately reflect contemporary physician work patterns.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the accuracy of physician work relative values in the Medicare Fee Schedule.
- To identify potential cost savings within the MFS by incorporating productivity gains.
- To evaluate the impact of technological advancements and delegation on physician work.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of four studies examining physician time in office and operating room settings.
- Review of surgeon self-reported work and handoff patterns.
- Assessment of payment structures for postoperative care.
- Evaluation of potential savings from increased delegation and service reengineering.
Main Results:
- Physician time with patients has decreased in offices and operating rooms.
- Surgeons report increased total work despite reduced operating room times.
- Costly handoffs to non-surgeons are increasing, with surgeons retaining full payment.
- Significant savings are possible through MFS adjustments reflecting productivity.
Conclusions:
- The current Medicare Fee Schedule does not adequately account for physician productivity gains.
- Integrating factors like delegation, technological learning, and service reengineering could unlock substantial savings.
- Periodic reviews of the MFS require updating to accurately reflect current physician work and efficiency.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
Preventive Healthcare Services