Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Observational Studies01:11

Observational Studies

Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Bioequivalence: Overview01:16

Bioequivalence: Overview

Pharmaceutical equivalents, by definition, are drug products with the same active ingredient in the same quantities, encapsulated in identical dosage forms, and intended for the same administration routes. These pharmaceutical equivalents are deemed bioequivalent if the bioavailability of the active entity in the drug preparations is similar. Moreover, pharmaceutical equivalents demonstrating bioequivalence are also regarded as therapeutically equivalent. This means that when used as directed,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evidence and Pricing: Bridging the Comparative Effectiveness Gap in Federal and State Drug Policy.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2026
Same author

The evolving global landscape of first-in-class oncology drug innovation.

Signal transduction and targeted therapy·2026
Same author

Clinically Meaningful, Patient-Centered Endpoints for Real-World Evidence Generation in Breast Cancer: Perspectives from the Multidisciplinary TRIUMPH Initiative.

Advances in therapy·2026
Same author

The effectiveness and value of brensocatib for the treatment of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis.

Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy·2026
Same author

How to make one line in the FDA Commissioner's new drug review program into a force for affordable access for patients.

Health affairs scholar·2025
Same author

Health Technology Assessment, Again: A Transparent, Evidence-Based Approach For CMS Drug Price Negotiations.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
10:38

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies

Published on: January 16, 2019

GRACE principles: recognizing high-quality observational studies of comparative effectiveness.

Nancy A Dreyer1, Sebastian Schneeweiss, Barbara J McNeil

  • 1Outcome Sciences, Inc, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. ndreyer@outcome.com

The American Journal of Managed Care
|June 22, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Nonrandomized comparative effectiveness studies offer valuable insights for treatment understanding. The GRACE principles guide the evaluation of these observational research studies for improved quality and practical application in healthcare.

More Related Videos

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
10:38

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies

Published on: January 16, 2019

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Epidemiology
  • Clinical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Nonrandomized comparative effectiveness studies (NRCES) are crucial for understanding treatments but face challenges in quality assessment.
  • Methodological limitations and lack of standardized principles hinder the practical use of NRCES.
  • Thoughtfully designed, well-conducted, and carefully analyzed NRCES can still yield valuable information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce the GRACE (Good Research for Comparative Effectiveness) principles.
  • To provide a framework for evaluating the quality of observational research studies of comparative effectiveness.
  • To aid healthcare providers, researchers, and editors in assessing NRCES.

Main Methods:

  • Development of the GRACE principles by experienced researchers.
  • Vetting of principles through presentations, critique, and consensus-building.
  • Formal review by the International Society of Pharmacoepidemiology.

Main Results:

  • The GRACE principles offer high-level concepts for good practice in NRCES.
  • The principles consist of a series of guiding questions for evaluation.
  • No scoring system is provided, emphasizing judgment and evidence weighing.

Conclusions:

  • The GRACE principles enhance the evaluation of observational studies in comparative effectiveness research.
  • These principles support the thoughtful design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of NRCES.
  • GRACE promotes a nuanced interpretation of observational data for routine care applicability.