Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Catheter-based Endovascular Angioplasty for Fibrosing Mediastinitis-associated Pulmonary Vein Stenosis
Published on: August 26, 2025
Immediate and long-term outcome of multiple percutaneous interventions in patients with rheumatic valvular stenosis
Osama Rifaie1, Adel El-Itriby, Tarek Zaki
1Faculty of Medicine, Aim Shams University, Cardiology Department, Cairo, Egypt.
Insights
Percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty effectively treats rheumatic valvular stenosis, showing good immediate and long-term results for mitral, aortic, and tricuspid valves.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Valvular Heart Disease
Background:
- Rheumatic heart disease commonly causes valvular stenosis.
- Percutaneous valvuloplasty offers a less invasive treatment option.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the immediate and long-term outcomes of combined percutaneous valvuloplasty for mitral, aortic, and tricuspid valves in rheumatic stenosis.
- To assess the feasibility and efficacy of these procedures.
Main Methods:
- Eleven patients with rheumatic valvular stenosis underwent combined percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty (PMV), percutaneous aortic valvuloplasty (PAV), and/or percutaneous tricuspid valvuloplasty (PTV).
- Procedures utilized standard double balloon techniques and retrograde/antegrade approaches for PAV.
- Echocardiography assessed outcomes pre- and post-procedure, with follow-up up to 60 months.
Main Results:
- Immediate success rates were high: PMV (91%), PAV (100%), PTV (80%).
- Long-term follow-up showed low restenosis rates for PMV (9%) and PAV (0%), but higher for PTV (40%).
Conclusions:
- Percutaneous balloon dilatation is a feasible treatment for rheumatic valvular stenosis.
- The procedure demonstrates adequate immediate and long-term outcomes, particularly for mitral and aortic valves.
Aims:
We sought to explore the immediate and long-term outcome of combined percutaneous valvuloplasty of the mitral and/or aortic and/or tricuspid valves in a series of patients with rheumatic valvular stenosis.
Methods And Results:
A total of 11 patients (three underwent percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty [PMV], percutaneous aortic valvuloplasty [PAV] and percutaneous tricuspid valvuloplasty [PTV], six underwent PMV and PAV, and two underwent PMV and PTV) were enrolled. PMV was performed by the standard double balloon technique. PAV was always performed after PMV, employing the retrograde approach in eight patients and the antegrade approach in one patient. PTV was performed by the double balloon technique. Echocardiographic assessment was performed before and after the procedures. Follow-up was performed in all patients for a period that ranged from 12 and up to 60 months. PMV was successful in 10 out of 11 cases (91%); PAV was successful in all nine procedures (100%), while PTV was successful in four out of five cases (80%). At long-term follow-up, one case of restenosis occurred following PMV (9%), two following PTV (40%), and no restenosis occurred following PAV.
Conclusions:
Percutaneous balloon dilatation of rheumatic valvular stenosis is feasible with fairly adequate immediate and long-term outcome.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management
Pericarditis III: Medical Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease IV: Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
