Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contrasting cognitive control in the Simon and spatial Stroop tasks regarding their interference with the control of standing balance.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Exploring age-related inhibitory deficits in auditory attention: Evidence from attention switching.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Visual-manual response selection produces dual-task interference in auditory-verbal memory encoding.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Opposite effects of interruption frequency on performance in interrupted and uninterrupted multistep task.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Huh, what did they say again? The influence of task interruption position and workload on auditory-verbal memory performance.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026
Same author

Dissociating Task Selection and Response Selection in Dual-Task Contexts: Evidence from a Novel Trial-by-Trial Analysis of Temporal Overlap between Tasks.

Journal of cognition·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm
06:43

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm

Published on: July 26, 2013

Central cross-talk in task switching: Evidence from manipulating input-output modality compatibility.

Denise Nadine Stephan1, Iring Koch

  • 1Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany. stephan@psych.rwth-aachen.de

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|June 23, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Task switching is easier when input and output modalities match. This study shows compatible input-output (I-O) modality mappings reduce task-switching costs, suggesting modality-specific task sets.

More Related Videos

Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies
10:09

Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies

Published on: September 22, 2014

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm
06:43

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm

Published on: July 26, 2013

Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies
10:09

Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies

Published on: September 22, 2014

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Task switching involves cognitive control and the ability to disengage from one task and engage in another.
  • Input-output (I-O) modality compatibility, the relationship between stimulus modality and response modality, is a key factor influencing cognitive performance.
  • Understanding I-O modality compatibility in task switching is crucial for optimizing human performance in complex environments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of I-O modality compatibility on task switching costs.
  • To determine if modality-specific task sets influence the efficiency of task switching.
  • To examine the temporal dynamics of the I-O modality compatibility effect during task switching.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted to assess task switching costs under conditions of compatible and incompatible I-O modality mappings.
  • Experiment 1 compared switch costs between compatible (auditory-vocal, visual-manual) and incompatible (auditory-manual, visual-vocal) task pairs.
  • Experiment 2 manipulated the response-stimulus interval (RSI) to explore the time course of the compatibility effect.

Main Results:

  • Switch costs were significantly smaller for compatible I-O modality mappings compared to incompatible mappings.
  • The compatibility effect on switch costs was evident with a short response-stimulus interval (RSI).
  • The influence of I-O modality compatibility on switch costs diminished with a longer RSI.

Conclusions:

  • The findings support the hypothesis that task sets are modality-specific.
  • Compatible I-O modality mappings may benefit from inherent linkages, reducing interference and switch costs.
  • Incompatible I-O mappings appear to increase cross-talk between response modalities, leading to higher switch costs.