Related Experiment Videos
Comparison of long-term prognostic evaluation between pre-intervention thrombolysis and primary coronary
Tomonori Itoh1, Ken'ichi Fukami, Tomomi Suzuki
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Memorial Heart Center, Iwate Medical University, Morioka 020-8505, Japan. t_itoh@imu.ncvc.go.jp
Insights
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) offers superior long-term outcomes for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients compared to pre-treatment thrombolysis. Facilitated PCI may provide similar effectiveness to primary PCI in STEMI management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Acute Coronary Syndromes
Background:
- Limited data exists on the comparative efficacy of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus pre-intervention thrombolysis with facilitated PCI in Japanese ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients.
- Evaluating acute and long-term prognostic differences is crucial for optimizing STEMI treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of primary PCI versus pre-treatment with tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) followed by facilitated PCI in Japanese STEMI patients.
- To assess differences in coronary patency, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and major adverse cardiac event (MACE)-free rates.
Main Methods:
- A randomized study involving 101 STEMI patients.
- Patients were assigned to either primary PCI or pre-treatment with t-PA (prior-t-PA group).
- The prior-t-PA group was further divided into facilitated PCI and prior-t-PA alone subgroups for analysis.
Main Results:
- The prior-t-PA group showed significantly higher initial patency rates and 6-month LVEF compared to the primary-PCI group (P<0.001 and P=0.01, respectively).
- However, the 5-year MACE-free rate was significantly lower in the prior-t-PA group (58.7%) versus the primary-PCI group (80.9%, P=0.03).
- Facilitated PCI demonstrated comparable MACE-free rates to primary PCI (73.7% vs 80.9%, P=0.39), while prior-t-PA alone had a significantly lower MACE-free rate (48.1%, P=0.01).
Conclusions:
- Primary PCI demonstrates superior long-term prognostic benefits over pre-intervention thrombolysis in STEMI patients.
- Facilitated PCI emerges as a potentially effective alternative, offering outcomes similar to primary PCI for STEMI management.
Background:
Acute efficacy and long-term prognostic differences between ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (primary PCI) and those treated with pre-intervention thrombolysis combined with back-up of facilitated PCI has not been evaluated in Japanese patients. The purpose of the present study was therefore to evaluate the differences between treatment with primary PCI (primary-PCI group) and pre-treatment with tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) combined with back-up of facilitated PCI (prior-t-PA group).
Methods And Results:
One hundred and one patients with STEMI were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Patients in the prior-t-PA group were then divided into 2 further groups, the facilitated-PCI and prior-t-PA alone groups. The patency rate at initial angiography, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 6 months, and the major adverse cardiac event (MACE)-free rate at 5 years were then compared between the groups. The patency rate and LVEF in the prior-t-PA group was significantly higher than in the primary-PCI group (69% vs 17% respectively, P<0.001; 61.6+/-9.5% vs 55.0+/-11.6%, respectively; P=0.01). The MACE-free rate in the prior-t-PA group, however, was lower than in the primary-PCI group (58.7% vs 80.9%; P=0.03). The MACE-free rate in the facilitated-PCI group was equal to that in the primary-PCI group (73.7% vs 80.9%; P=0.39), whereas the MACE-free rate in the prior-t-PA-alone group was significantly lower than in the primary-PCI group (48.1% vs 80.9%; P=0.01).
Conclusions:
Primary PCI is superior to pre-intervention thrombolysis for long-term prognosis. Moreover, facilitated PCI may be as effective as primary PCI in patients with STEMI.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care