Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hepatic Arachidonic Acid Dysregulation Impairs Double-Negative Regulatory T Cell-Mediated Immunoregulation via CD39 Downregulation and Drives MASLD Development.

Journal of immunology research·2026
Same author

Comparative wear behavior of lithium disilicate CAD/CAM ceramics under simulated mastication.

Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials·2026
Same author

Single-cell profiling reveals hepatic monocyte-derived macrophages heterogeneity during steatotic liver disease.

Hepatology communications·2026
Same author

The heterogeneity and sexual-dimorphism of human TCRαβ<sup>+</sup>CD4<sup>-</sup>CD8<sup>-</sup> double negative T cells.

Journal of genetics and genomics = Yi chuan xue bao·2026
Same author

Nitrate Enhances Gastric Mucosa Defense and Repair Process in Ethanol-Induced Gastric Ulcer Rats via the Notch-Tff2 Pathway.

MedComm·2026
Same author

Simvastatin Alleviates ConA-Induced Autoimmune Hepatitis by Inhibiting CD4<sup>+</sup> T Cell Activation via Calcium-NFATC3 Pathway.

Inflammation·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
06:36

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness

Published on: March 14, 2025

Surface morphology optimization for osseointegration of coated implants.

Chaiy Rungsiyakull1, Qing Li, Guangyong Sun

  • 1School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

Biomaterials
|June 25, 2010
PubMed
Summary

This study links implant surface morphology to bone remodeling for better dental implant design. Optimal coating parameters enhance bone density and interfacial stability, improving implant success.

More Related Videos

Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo
12:19

Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo

Published on: July 1, 2013

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
11:51

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

Published on: February 10, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
06:36

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness

Published on: March 14, 2025

Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo
12:19

Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo

Published on: July 1, 2013

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
11:51

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

Published on: February 10, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Biomechanics
  • Computational Modeling

Background:

  • Dental implant success depends on bone integration and stability.
  • Surface morphology of porous implants influences micromechanics and bone response.
  • Understanding bone remodeling around implants is crucial for design optimization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish a relationship between surface morphology, micromechanics, and bone remodeling for porous implants.
  • To develop a multiobjective optimization framework for biomaterial coating design.
  • To enhance dental implant design for improved osseointegration.

Main Methods:

  • Developed multiscale modeling and remodeling techniques.
  • Performed macroscopic analysis followed by microscopic analysis of bone remodeling.
  • Utilized the response surface method (RSM) to correlate coating parameters with bone responses.

Main Results:

  • Increased volume fraction of coating beads/particles enhances bone density.
  • Bead/particle size had a minimal impact on bone remodeling responses.
  • Optimal design parameters identified: 100 µm--35% for cortical bone, 38 µm--17.5% for cancellous bone.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides a framework for optimizing implant surface coatings.
  • Specific surface coating designs are recommended for different bone types (cortical and cancellous) to maximize interfacial stability.
  • Findings align with clinical data, suggesting improved implant performance.