Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
Published on: May 8, 2018
Helical tomotherapy for single and multiple liver tumours.
Tsair-Fwu Lee1, Pei-Ju Chao, Fu-Min Fang
1Medical Physics and Informatics Lab, (EE), National Kaohsiung University of Applied Sciences, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. tflee@cc.kuas.edu.tw
Helical tomotherapy (HT) offers dosimetric benefits for multiple liver tumours, sparing organs at risk. For single liver tumours, step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SaS-IMRT) is more efficient in delivery time and monitor units.
Area of Science:
- Radiation Oncology
- Medical Physics
- Oncology
Background:
- Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is a standard treatment for liver tumours.
- Helical tomotherapy (HT) and step-and-shoot IMRT (SaS-IMRT) are two IMRT techniques.
- Comparative dosimetric analysis is crucial for optimizing treatment plans.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantitatively evaluate the dosimetric performance of HT compared to SaS-IMRT for single and multiple liver tumours.
- To assess the impact of HT on target coverage, dose homogeneity, and organ-at-risk sparing.
- To analyze treatment efficiency metrics including delivery time and monitor units.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 16 patients with liver tumours previously treated with SaS-IMRT.
- Re-planning of patient cases using HT.
- Dosimetric indices evaluated: conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), PTV prescription, NTCP, V(30 Gy), V(50%), QI, MU/fr, and delivery time.
Main Results:
- For single liver tumours, no significant dosimetric difference was observed between HT and SaS-IMRT. SaS-IMRT showed shorter delivery time and lower MU/fr.
- For multiple liver tumours, HT demonstrated significant improvements in CI (14%) and HI (4%) compared to SaS-IMRT.
- HT resulted in lower V(50%), V(30 Gy), and QI values, indicating superior OAR sparing and reduced normal liver NTCP (2.38% vs 20.27%). HT also had a shorter delivery time.
Conclusions:
- HT offers significant dosimetric advantages over SaS-IMRT for multiple liver tumours, particularly in sparing organs at risk.
- For single liver tumours, SaS-IMRT is more efficient in terms of MU/fr and delivery time, with no significant dosimetric compromise.
- HT is a promising technique for improving treatment outcomes in complex liver tumour cases.
More Related Videos
09:49Dual-phase Cone-beam Computed Tomography to See, Reach, and Treat Hepatocellular Carcinoma during Drug-eluting Beads Transarterial Chemo-embolization
Published on: December 2, 2013
06:39Three-dimensional Location Approach with Silk Thread Guided Laparoscopic Segmentectomy for Liver Tumor
Published on: May 23, 2025