Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...

Correlation and Causation

Correlation and Causation

Correlation and CausationStatistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. A relationship between variables shows correlation, but it does not show cause-and-effect. A direct cause-and-effect relationship requires additional controlled experiments. If no consistent relationship exists between the variables, then there is no correlation.Correlation versus CausationIf the dependent variable increases or decreases when the...

Cause and Effect

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:

Network Function of a Circuit

Network Function of a Circuit

Frequency response analysis in electrical circuits provides vital insights into a circuit's behavior as the frequency of the input signal changes. The transfer function, a mathematical tool, is instrumental in understanding this behavior. It defines the relationship between phasor output and input and comes in four types: voltage gain, current gain, transfer impedance, and transfer admittance. The critical components of the transfer function are the poles and zeros.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Consistent Treatment of Variables and Causation Poses a Challenge for Behavioral Research Methods: A Commentary on Nesselroade and Molenaar (2016).

Multivariate behavioral research·2016

Same author

Hypothesis Formulation, Model Interpretation, and Model Equivalence: Implications of a Mereological Causal Interpretation of Structural Equation Models.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016

Same author

Roger Ellis Millsap (1954-2014).

The American psychologist·2015

Same author

Abductive inferences to psychological variables: Steiger's question and best explanations of psychopathy.

Journal of clinical psychology·2008

Same author

Behavioral cues to deception vs. topic incriminating potential in criminal confessions.

Law and human behavior·2005

Same author

Beyond objectivity and subjectivity.

The American psychologist·2002

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Large Scale Energy Efficient Sensor Network Routing Using a Quantum Processor Unit

Large Scale Energy Efficient Sensor Network Routing Using a Quantum Processor Unit

Published on: September 8, 2023

Questions about networks, measurement, and causation.

Keith A Markus¹

¹Psychology Department, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY 10019, USA. kmarkus@aol.com

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences

|June 30, 2010

Summary

Cramer et al. explore network analysis for symptoms, raising key questions about causal interpretation and individual differences. Further research is needed to validate network stability and measurement models.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Large Scale Energy Efficient Sensor Network Routing Using a Quantum Processor Unit

Large Scale Energy Efficient Sensor Network Routing Using a Quantum Processor Unit

Published on: September 8, 2023

Area of Science:

Psychometrics
Network Science
Clinical Psychology

Background:

Network analysis is increasingly applied to understand symptom relationships in mental health.
Previous studies have utilized network models to explore symptom structures.

Purpose of the Study:

To critically evaluate the application of network analysis to psychological symptoms.
To identify open questions and areas for future research in network psychometrics.

Main Methods:

The study reviews and discusses the methodological and theoretical underpinnings of network analysis in symptom research.
It examines the interpretation of causal relationships within symptom networks.

Main Results:

Several critical questions regarding causal interpretation, latent variables, and individual differences in network structures remain unresolved.
The stability and measurement properties of network models require further empirical support.

Conclusions:

While network analysis offers a valuable framework, its application to symptoms necessitates careful consideration of theoretical assumptions and empirical validation.
Future research should focus on addressing the identified limitations to strengthen the utility of network models in psychological science.