Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
Habitat Fragmentation02:31

Habitat Fragmentation

Habitat fragmentation describes the division of a more extensive, continuous habitat into smaller, discontinuous areas. Human activities such as land conversion, as well as slower geological processes leading to changes in the physical environment, are the two leading causes of habitat fragmentation. The fragmentation process typically follows the same steps: perforation, dissection, fragmentation, shrinkage, and attrition.
Ecological Niches02:02

Ecological Niches

All organisms have a position within an ecosystem. The complete set of living and nonliving factors—including food resources, climate, and terrain—that define the position of a given organism are collectively referred to as the organism’s ecological niche.Multiple species cannot occupy the exact same niche within their habitat. If the niches of two or more species overlap to a large extent, the competitive exclusion principle dictates that one species will outcompete the other, forcing it to...
Ecological Succession02:17

Ecological Succession

Ecological succession is influenced by the processes of facilitation, inhibition, and toleration. Facilitation occurs when early successional species create more favorable ecological conditions for subsequent species, such as enhanced nutrient, water, or light availability. In contrast, inhibition happens when early successional species create unfavorable ecological conditions for potential successive species, such as limiting resource availability. In some cases, later successional species...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rebuilding microbiomes: Facilitating animal-microbe interactions through ecological restoration and rewilding.

Journal of environmental management·2025
Same author

Termites mitigate the effects of drought in tropical rainforest.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2019
Same author

Prediction of gestational age based on genome-wide differentially methylated regions.

Genome biology·2016
Same author

Suppression of savanna ants alters invertebrate composition and influences key ecosystem processes.

Ecology·2016
Same author

25-Hydroxyvitamin D in pregnancy and genome wide cord blood DNA methylation in two pregnancy cohorts (MoBa and ALSPAC).

The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology·2016
Same author

Does morphology predict trophic position and habitat use of ant species and assemblages?

Oecologia·2014

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Collection and Long-Term Maintenance of Leaf-Cutting Ants (Atta) in Laboratory Conditions
10:11

Collection and Long-Term Maintenance of Leaf-Cutting Ants (Atta) in Laboratory Conditions

Published on: August 30, 2022

How does habitat complexity affect ant foraging success? A test using functional measures on three continents.

H Gibb1, C L Parr

  • 1Department of Zoology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. h.gibb@latrobe.edu.au

Oecologia
|July 1, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Habitat complexity influences ant foraging success globally. More complex environments slow ant discovery and reduce resource monopolization, affecting ant body size and behavior across diverse regions.

More Related Videos

A Visual Guide for Studying Behavioral Defenses to Pathogen Attacks in Leaf-Cutting Ants
08:10

A Visual Guide for Studying Behavioral Defenses to Pathogen Attacks in Leaf-Cutting Ants

Published on: October 12, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Collection and Long-Term Maintenance of Leaf-Cutting Ants (Atta) in Laboratory Conditions
10:11

Collection and Long-Term Maintenance of Leaf-Cutting Ants (Atta) in Laboratory Conditions

Published on: August 30, 2022

A Visual Guide for Studying Behavioral Defenses to Pathogen Attacks in Leaf-Cutting Ants
08:10

A Visual Guide for Studying Behavioral Defenses to Pathogen Attacks in Leaf-Cutting Ants

Published on: October 12, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Community Ecology

Background:

  • Habitat complexity shapes ecological processes like competition and predation.
  • Most studies examine habitat complexity's effects locally, limiting generalizability.
  • A global approach can reveal consistent patterns independent of local species assemblages.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test the effects of natural and manipulated habitat complexities on ant assemblages.
  • To determine if habitat complexity globally influences ant foraging success measures.
  • To investigate how habitat complexity affects ant discovery rates, resource monopolization, and body size.

Main Methods:

  • Compared ant assemblages from South Africa, Australia, and Sweden.
  • Assessed responses to both natural and manipulated habitat complexities.
  • Measured ant foraging rates (discovery and monopolization) and ant body size index.

Main Results:

  • Ants were slower to discover baits in more complex habitats.
  • Resource monopolization rates were lower in complex habitats, indicating reduced defense.
  • Ants discovering and monopolizing resources were smaller in simple natural habitats compared to complex ones.

Conclusions:

  • Habitat complexity consistently affects ant foraging success, including discovery, monopolization, and body size traits.
  • Global patterns in ant responses to habitat complexity were observed, though regional variations exist.
  • Findings highlight the significant role of habitat structure in regulating functional foraging dynamics in ant communities.